484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36650428)
1. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of heterogeneity and heterogeneity interval estimators in random-effects meta-analysis of the standardized mean difference in education and psychology.
Boedeker P; Henson RK
Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):346-364. PubMed ID: 31599614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias and precision of some classical ANOVA effect sizes when assumptions are violated.
Troncoso Skidmore S; Thompson B
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):536-46. PubMed ID: 23055163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Monte Carlo experiments to select meta-analytic estimators.
Hong S; Reed WR
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):192-215. PubMed ID: 33150663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias and precision of methods for estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time from an individual patient data meta-analysis.
Lueza B; Rotolo F; Bonastre J; Pignon JP; Michiels S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():37. PubMed ID: 27025706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining estimators in interlaboratory studies and meta-analyses.
Huang H
Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):526-543. PubMed ID: 36916486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of 20 heterogeneity variance estimators in statistical synthesis of results from studies: a simulation study.
Petropoulou M; Mavridis D
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4266-4280. PubMed ID: 28815652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A random effects meta-analysis model with Box-Cox transformation.
Yamaguchi Y; Maruo K; Partlett C; Riley RD
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):109. PubMed ID: 28724350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
