BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36652428)

  • 1. Cost-utility analysis of atezolizumab with bevacizumab in untreated unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in France.
    Gaugain L; Cawston H; Dubois de Gennes C; Sanchez Alvares J; Nahon P; Mazaleyrat B; Le Dissez C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280442. PubMed ID: 36652428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Su D; Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.
    Wen F; Zheng H; Zhang P; Liao W; Zhou K; Li Q
    Liver Int; 2021 May; 41(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 33556230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhou T; Cao Y; Wang X; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
    Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2165-2177. PubMed ID: 35296994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-reported outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave150): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
    Galle PR; Finn RS; Qin S; Ikeda M; Zhu AX; Kim TY; Kudo M; Breder V; Merle P; Kaseb A; Li D; Mulla S; Verret W; Xu DZ; Hernandez S; Ding B; Liu J; Huang C; Lim HY; Cheng AL; Ducreux M
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 34051880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Time to Deterioration in Quality of Life.
    Agirrezabal I; Brennan VK; Colaone F; Shergill S; Pereira H; Chatellier G; Vilgrain V
    Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2035-2051. PubMed ID: 35279814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cheng AL; Qin S; Ikeda M; Galle PR; Ducreux M; Kim TY; Lim HY; Kudo M; Breder V; Merle P; Kaseb AO; Li D; Verret W; Ma N; Nicholas A; Wang Y; Li L; Zhu AX; Finn RS
    J Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 76(4):862-873. PubMed ID: 34902530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Chen X
    Cancer; 2022 Nov; 128(22):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 36111952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wang L; Peng Y; Qin S; Wan X; Zeng X; Li S; Liu Q; Tan C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0279786. PubMed ID: 37053300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao M; Pan X; Yin Y; Hu H; Wei J; Bai Z; Tang W
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():869960. PubMed ID: 35493395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in first line treatment for Chinese subpopulation with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Tseng CY; Tsai YW; Shiu MN
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1264417. PubMed ID: 38023232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sorafenib versus Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Chen S; Peng Z; Wei M; Liu W; Dai Z; Wang H; Mei J; Cheong M; Zhang H; Kuang M
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):392. PubMed ID: 29621988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
    Zhang P; Yang Y; Wen F; Wheeler J; Fu P; Li Q
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 27118432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
    Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-World Data for the Evaluation of Transarterial Radioembolization versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Rognoni C; Ciani O; Sommariva S; Tarricone R
    Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):336-344. PubMed ID: 28292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus an Anti-VEGF Antibody as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Li L; Yang S; Chen Y; Tian L; He Y; Wu B; Dong D
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():891008. PubMed ID: 35721168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Cost Effectiveness of Donafenib Compared With Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China.
    Meng R; Cao Y; Zhou T; Hu H; Qiu Y
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():794131. PubMed ID: 35433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.
    Ren Z; Xu J; Bai Y; Xu A; Cang S; Du C; Li Q; Lu Y; Chen Y; Guo Y; Chen Z; Liu B; Jia W; Wu J; Wang J; Shao G; Zhang B; Shan Y; Meng Z; Wu J; Gu S; Yang W; Liu C; Shi X; Gao Z; Yin T; Cui J; Huang M; Xing B; Mao Y; Teng G; Qin Y; Wang J; Xia F; Yin G; Yang Y; Chen M; Wang Y; Zhou H; Fan J;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):977-990. PubMed ID: 34143971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness of Lenvatinib Compared with Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Australia.
    Saiyed M; Byrnes J; Srivastava T; Scuffham P; Downes M
    Clin Drug Investig; 2020 Dec; 40(12):1167-1176. PubMed ID: 33140194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.