145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36653209)
1. Fit analysis of stereolithography-manufactured three-unit resin prosthesis with different 3D-printing build orientations and layer thicknesses.
Jang G; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):301-312. PubMed ID: 36653209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of the marginal fit of a 3D-printed three-unit resin prosthesis with different build orientations and layer thicknesses.
Yang MS; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Park JM
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 14(4):250-261. PubMed ID: 36105878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics.
Park GS; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Seo DG
Materials (Basel); 2019 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 31395801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influences of build angle on the accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Rubayo DD; Phasuk K; Vickery JM; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 33143902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Build angle effect on 3D-printed dental crowns marginal fit using digital light-processing and stereo-lithography technology: an in vitro study.
Farag E; Sabet A; Ebeid K; El Sergany O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38212816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of design software program and manufacturing method on the marginal and internal adaptation of esthetic crowns for primary teeth: A microcomputed tomography evaluation.
Aktaş N; Bani M; Ocak M; Bankoğlu Güngör M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):519.e1-519.e9. PubMed ID: 38195256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Akhlaghian M; Pardis S; Mir N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials.
Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
Alharbi N; Alharbi S; Cuijpers VMJI; Osman RB; Wismeijer D
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 29032176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of zirconia crowns manufactured by stereolithography with an occlusal full-supporting structure: An in vitro study.
Li R; Xu T; Wang Y; Sun Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):902-907. PubMed ID: 35183363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost and effectiveness of 3-dimensionally printed model using three different printing layer parameters and two resins.
Dias Resende CC; Quirino Barbosa TA; Moura GF; Piola Rizzante FA; Mendonça G; Zancopé K; Domingues das Neves F
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):350-353. PubMed ID: 34218898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers.
Bennett GW; Kim SK
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of photopolymer resins for dental prosthetics fabricated via the stereolithography process at different polymerization temperatures. Part II: Dimensional accuracy and fracture load of fixed dental prostheses.
Lee JM; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):330.e1-330.e9. PubMed ID: 37993321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of various printing parameters on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D-printed partial denture framework.
Grymak A; Badarneh A; Ma S; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105688. PubMed ID: 36753847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging.
Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB; Olcay EO; Demirel M; Demir E
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104155. PubMed ID: 35526752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
