These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36653209)

  • 21. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.
    Ortensi L; Lo Castro E; Rapisarda E; Pedullà E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface roughness and marginal adaptation of stereolithography versus digital light processing three-dimensional printed resins: An
    Wadhwani V; Sivaswamy V; Rajaraman V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):377-381. PubMed ID: 36511072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness of 3-unit interim fixed partial dentures.
    Çakmak G; Cuellar AR; Donmez MB; Abou-Ayash S; Lu WE; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):718-725. PubMed ID: 35636984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
    Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
    Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal fit of milled versus different 3D-printed materials for provisional fixed dental prostheses: an
    Igreţ A; Rotar RN; Ille C; Topală F; Jivănescu A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2023 Jul; 96(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 37577020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
    Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
    Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
    Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of build orientation on adaptation of casting patterns for three-unit partial fixed dental prostheses fabricated by using digital light projection.
    Chaiamornsup P; Iwasaki N; Tsuchida Y; Takahashi H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 33648796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley W; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of Additively Manufactured and Milled Interim 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses.
    Karasan D; Legaz J; Boitelle P; Mojon P; Fehmer V; Sailer I
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):58-69. PubMed ID: 34792821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Micro-CT analysis of marginal and internal fit of milled and pressed polyetheretherketone single crowns.
    Attia MA; Blunt L; Bills P; Tawfik A; Radawn M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jun; 129(6):906.e1-906.e10. PubMed ID: 37072286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of orthodontic aligners printed 3-dimensionally.
    Boyer RA; Kasper FK; English JD; Jacob HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Nov; 160(5):732-742.e1. PubMed ID: 34752256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientation: A Microcomputed tomography study.
    Radwan M; Abdou A; Tawfik A; Bills P; Blunt L; Kusumasari C; Mahrous A
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e494-e502. PubMed ID: 38725814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique.
    Hasanzade M; Yaghoobi N; Nematollahi P; Ghazanfari R
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 9(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 37386767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Failure load of milled, 3D-printed, and conventional chairside-dispensed interim 3-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Henderson JY; Korioth TVP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):275.e1-275.e7. PubMed ID: 34895902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of layer thickness and printing orientation on the color stability and stainability of a 3D-printed resin material.
    Lee EH; Ahn JS; Lim YJ; Kwon HB; Kim MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):784.e1-784.e7. PubMed ID: 35221037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.