196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36654955)
21. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Sun X; Li J; Gao Q; Guo X; Liu JX; Gan W; Yang S
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 81(2):109-121. PubMed ID: 35180108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circulating cell-free DNA as a diagnostic biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer.
He X; Chi Y; Peng J; Hu W; Ding C; Li B
J Thorac Dis; 2022 Jun; 14(6):2103-2111. PubMed ID: 35813759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Added Value of a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions by Radiologists With Different Experience.
Wei Q; Zeng SE; Wang LP; Yan YJ; Wang T; Xu JW; Zhang MY; Lv WZ; Dietrich CF; Cui XW
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1355-1363. PubMed ID: 34432320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Ultrasound Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules Based on Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Technology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xue Y; Zhou Y; Wang T; Chen H; Wu L; Ling H; Wang H; Qiu L; Ye D; Wang B
Int J Endocrinol; 2022; 2022():9492056. PubMed ID: 36193283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Principal component regression-based contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation system for the management of BI-RADS US 4A breast masses: objective assistance for radiologists.
Lin ZM; Chen JF; Xu FT; Liu CM; Chen JS; Wang Y; Zhang C; Huang PT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1737-1746. PubMed ID: 33838937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computer-aided diagnostic system with automated deep learning method based on the AutoGluon framework improved the diagnostic accuracy of early esophageal cancer.
Gao X; Lin J; Qu C; Wang C; Wu A; Zhu J; Xu C
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2024 Apr; 15(2):535-543. PubMed ID: 38756633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A systematic review and meta-analysis of indirect comparison between miRNA and ctDNA in diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Fu X; Liu Y
Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Dec; 10(12):5372-5382. PubMed ID: 35116384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk.
Le Boulc'h M; Bekhouche A; Kermarrec E; Milon A; Abdel Wahab C; Zilberman S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Thomassin-Naggara I
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Dec; 101(12):811-819. PubMed ID: 32819886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang SS; Lin KW; Liu KL; Wu YM; Lien WC; Wang HP
World J Emerg Surg; 2023 Nov; 18(1):54. PubMed ID: 38037062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.
Manzotti C; Casazza G; Stimac T; Nikolova D; Gluud C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(7):CD012546. PubMed ID: 31283001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis].
Pei Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; He S; Zhou J; Jiang H; Wang X
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jan; 32(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32148240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Clinical Assessment of an Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis System in Differentiating Thyroid Nodules With Radiologists of Different Diagnostic Experience.
Zhang Y; Wu Q; Chen Y; Wang Y
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():557169. PubMed ID: 33042840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiologist versus Non-Radiologist Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis.
Issa PP; Mueller L; Hussein M; Albuck A; Shama M; Toraih E; Kandil E
Biomedicines; 2022 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36289838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Method Used in Association With the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Differentiating Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Du X; He Y; Lin W
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():882334. PubMed ID: 35812103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
