126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36656184)
1. The effect of metallic dental restorations and implants in causing patient discomfort and artefacts during magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck.
Ashok A; Ayyadanveettil P; Devarajan E; Thavakkara V; Latha N; Saraswathy A
Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(3):258-262. PubMed ID: 36656184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.
Johannsen KM; de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig JM; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):394-407. PubMed ID: 36178613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material.
Eggers G; Rieker M; Kress B; Fiebach J; Dickhaus H; Hassfeld S
MAGMA; 2005 May; 18(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 15785943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between dental restorations and artefacts on head magnetic resonance images in paediatric patients.
Tunlayadechanont P; Tunlayadechanont P; Sriudomporn N; Wisetsathon P; Duangthip D; Jirarattanasopha V
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38195814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns - Impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Schwindling FS; Heil A; Kuchenbecker S; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 27722227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.
Murakami S; Verdonschot RG; Kataoka M; Kakimoto N; Shimamoto H; Kreiborg S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(8):20160094. PubMed ID: 27459058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.
Cortes AR; Abdala-Junior R; Weber M; Arita ES; Ackerman JL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150136. PubMed ID: 26084475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing MRI susceptibility artefacts in implants using additively manufactured porous Ti-6Al-4V structures.
Carter LN; Addison O; Naji N; Seres P; Wilman AH; Shepherd DET; Grover L; Cox S
Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 107():338-348. PubMed ID: 32119921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.
Rendenbach C; Schoellchen M; Bueschel J; Gauer T; Sedlacik J; Kutzner D; Vallittu PK; Heiland M; Smeets R; Fiehler J; Siemonsen S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20170361. PubMed ID: 29718688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Truncation compensation and metallic dental implant artefact reduction in PET/MRI attenuation correction using deep learning-based object completion.
Arabi H; Zaidi H
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195002. PubMed ID: 32976116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Heil A; Schwindling FS; Nittka M; Grodzki D; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5104-5112. PubMed ID: 28698944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts.
Akdogan G; Istanbullu OB
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1163-1174. PubMed ID: 36306073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer?
Goerres GW; Schmid DT; Eyrich GK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 15070838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants.
Goerres GW; Hany TF; Kamel E; von Schulthess GK; Buck A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Mar; 29(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 12002712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of
Tran LTX; Sakamoto J; Kuribayashi A; Watanabe H; Tomisato H; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Oct; 48(7):20190036. PubMed ID: 31188678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.
Roser CJ; Hilgenfeld T; Saleem MA; Rückschloß T; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jul; 85(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 36700953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
