131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36657143)
1. Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.
Patton DA; Mansfield JA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 36657143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts.
Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():61-81. PubMed ID: 33636003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the front row seatback in frontal impact sled tests.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 35713941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Child occupant safety in unconventional seating for vehicles with automated driving systems.
Hu J; Boyle K; Orton NR; Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107223. PubMed ID: 37480661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles.
Zaseck LW; Orton NR; Gruber R; Rupp J; Scherer R; Reed M; Hu J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(6):642-649. PubMed ID: 28095025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in the kinematics of booster-seated pediatric occupants using two different car seats.
Juste-Lorente O; Maza M; Lorente AI; Lopez-Valdes FJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28594247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A current assessment of the THOR 50M in rear impacts.
White SD; Salmon JL; Prasad P; Burnett RA; Kim A; Buckman J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):208-212. PubMed ID: 36943173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of reclined seatback angles on the motion of booster-seated children during lateral-oblique low-acceleration impacts.
Graci V; Burns Iii J; Griffith M; Seacrist T
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107117. PubMed ID: 37216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
Viano DC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts.
Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of seatback deformation on out-of-position front-seat occupants in severe rear impacts.
Burnett RA; Parenteau CS; White SD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):184-188. PubMed ID: 36441165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes.
Hu J; Reed MP; Rupp JD; Fischer K; Lange P; Adler A
Stapp Car Crash J; 2017 Nov; 61():67-100. PubMed ID: 29394436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
