BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36658644)

  • 1. Cardiovascular complications in a diabetes prediction model using machine learning: a systematic review.
    Kee OT; Harun H; Mustafa N; Abdul Murad NA; Chin SF; Jaafar R; Abdullah N
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2023 Jan; 22(1):13. PubMed ID: 36658644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.
    Collins GS; Dhiman P; Andaur Navarro CL; Ma J; Hooft L; Reitsma JB; Logullo P; Beam AL; Peng L; Van Calster B; van Smeden M; Riley RD; Moons KG
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e048008. PubMed ID: 34244270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review.
    Yang Q; Fan X; Cao X; Hao W; Lu J; Wei J; Tian J; Yin M; Ge L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 36397723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAAG; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KG; Hooft L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038832. PubMed ID: 33177137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.
    Dhiman P; Ma J; Andaur Navarro CL; Speich B; Bullock G; Damen JAA; Hooft L; Kirtley S; Riley RD; Van Calster B; Moons KGM; Collins GS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):101. PubMed ID: 35395724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current state and completeness of reporting clinical prediction models using machine learning in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review.
    Munguía-Realpozo P; Etchegaray-Morales I; Mendoza-Pinto C; Méndez-Martínez S; Osorio-Peña ÁD; Ayón-Aguilar J; García-Carrasco M
    Autoimmun Rev; 2023 May; 22(5):103294. PubMed ID: 36791873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review.
    Andaur Navarro CL; Damen JAA; Takada T; Nijman SWJ; Dhiman P; Ma J; Collins GS; Bajpai R; Riley RD; Moons KGM; Hooft L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 35026997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of prediction models.
    Galbete A; Tamayo I; Librero J; Enguita-Germán M; Cambra K; Ibáñez-Beroiz B;
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2022 Feb; 184():109089. PubMed ID: 34648890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias and Reporting Quality of Clinical Prognostic Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Di J; Li X; Yang J; Li L; Yu X
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2022; 15():1189-1201. PubMed ID: 35702399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants.
    Alaa AM; Bolton T; Di Angelantonio E; Rudd JHF; van der Schaar M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0213653. PubMed ID: 31091238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining Bias and Reporting in Oral Health Prediction Modeling Studies.
    Du M; Haag D; Song Y; Lynch J; Mittinty M
    J Dent Res; 2020 Apr; 99(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 32028825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine Learning for the Prediction of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus during 5-Year Follow-up in Non-Diabetic Patients with Cardiovascular Risks.
    Choi BG; Rha SW; Kim SW; Kang JH; Park JY; Noh YK
    Yonsei Med J; 2019 Feb; 60(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30666841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
    Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
    Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning for the prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease during 3-year follow up in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
    Ding J; Luo Y; Shi H; Chen R; Luo S; Yang X; Xiao Z; Liang B; Yan Q; Xu J; Ji L
    J Diabetes Investig; 2023 Nov; 14(11):1289-1302. PubMed ID: 37605871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review.
    Gao Y; Li S; Jin Y; Zhou L; Sun S; Xu X; Li S; Yang H; Zhang Q; Wang Y
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2022 Dec; 8(12):e35750. PubMed ID: 36426919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction Models for Type 2 Diabetes Risk in the General Population: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.
    Asgari S; Khalili D; Hosseinpanah F; Hadaegh F
    Int J Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Jul; 19(3):e109206. PubMed ID: 34567135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction of Diabetes Complications: A Systematic Review.
    Tan KR; Seng JJB; Kwan YH; Chen YJ; Zainudin SB; Loh DHF; Liu N; Low LL
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 17(2):474-489. PubMed ID: 34727783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Machine-learning versus traditional approaches for atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk prognostication in primary prevention cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu W; Laranjo L; Klimis H; Chiang J; Yue J; Marschner S; Quiroz JC; Jorm L; Chow CK
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Jun; 9(4):310-322. PubMed ID: 36869800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of Cardiovascular Complication in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Using an XGBoost/GRU-ODE-Bayes-Based Machine-Learning Algorithm.
    Lee J; Choi Y; Ko T; Lee K; Shin J; Kim HS
    Endocrinol Metab (Seoul); 2024 Feb; 39(1):176-185. PubMed ID: 37989268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.