168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36660987)
1. Reliability of dual inclinometer for lumbar range of motion using two different Landmarking techniques.
Ahmed I; Mohseni Bandpei MA; Gilani SA; Ahmad A; Zaidi F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Oct; 72(10):1994-1997. PubMed ID: 36660987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of three landmarking methods for dual inclinometry measurements of lumbar flexion and extension.
MacDermid JC; Arumugam V; Vincent JI; Payne KL; So AK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 May; 16():121. PubMed ID: 25989834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion.
Pourahmadi MR; Taghipour M; Jannati E; Mohseni-Bandpei MA; Ebrahimi Takamjani I; Rajabzadeh F
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2355. PubMed ID: 27635328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of thoracic spine mobility and posture assessments in subjects with thoracic spine pain.
Takatalo J; Ylinen J; Pienimäki T; Häkkinen A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):529. PubMed ID: 32778081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of modified-modified Schober's test for the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
Amjad F; Mohseni Bandpei MA; Gilani SA; Arooj A
J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Sep; 72(9):1755-1759. PubMed ID: 36280970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® application for measuring active lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion in patients with low back pain.
Pourahmadi M; Momeni E; Mohseni N; Hesarikia H; Ghanjal A; Shamsoddini A
Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 Jan; 37(1):204-217. PubMed ID: 31081417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of the modified-modified Schöber and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension.
Williams R; Binkley J; Bloch R; Goldsmith CH; Minuk T
Phys Ther; 1993 Jan; 73(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 8417457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and criterion validity of the "Gyroscope" application of the iPod™ for measuring lumbar range of motion.
Boudreau N; Brochu FO; Dubreuil LM; Laurendeau T; Leblanc O; De Vette E; Tousignant-Laflamme Y
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2020; 33(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 31658035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating.
Nitschke JE; Nattrass CL; Disler PB; Chou MJ; Ooi KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10025021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.
Hoving JL; Pool JJ; van Mameren H; Devillé WJ; Assendelft WJ; de Vet HC; de Winter AF; Koes BW; Bouter LM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2005 Dec; 6():59. PubMed ID: 16351719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility.
MacDermid JC; Arumugam V; Vincent JI; Carroll KL
Open Orthop J; 2014; 8():355-60. PubMed ID: 25352928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Range of motion and lordosis of the lumbar spine: reliability of measurement and normative values.
Ng JK; Kippers V; Richardson CA; Parnianpour M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11148646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature.
Mannion AF; Knecht K; Balaban G; Dvorak J; Grob D
Eur Spine J; 2004 Mar; 13(2):122-36. PubMed ID: 14661104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Functional Ankle Motion Measures in Modern Dancers.
Dickson D; Hollman-Gage K; Ojofeitimi S; Bronner S
J Dance Med Sci; 2012 Sep; 16(3):116-25. PubMed ID: 26730940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility.
Saur PM; Ensink FB; Frese K; Seeger D; Hildebrandt J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jun; 21(11):1332-8. PubMed ID: 8725925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain.
Lewis JS; Valentine RE
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Mar; 11():39. PubMed ID: 20193055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change.
Tousignant M; Poulin L; Marchand S; Viau A; Place C
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(10):553-9. PubMed ID: 16019864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
