BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36661213)

  • 41. Socioeconomic, lifestyle and biological determinants of cervical screening coverage: Lolland-Falster Health Study, Denmark.
    Tabatabai MK; Lophaven S; Lauenborg J; Holmager T; Jepsen R; Lynge E
    Eur J Public Health; 2023 Aug; 33(4):568-573. PubMed ID: 37295965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Examining the association of clinician characteristics with perceived changes in cervical cancer screening and colposcopy practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods assessment.
    Fuzzell L; Brownstein NC; Fontenot HB; Lake PW; Michel A; Whitmer A; Rossi SL; McIntyre M; Vadaparampil ST; Perkins RB
    Elife; 2023 Sep; 12():. PubMed ID: 37656169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Consequences of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) lockdown on infection-related hospitalizations among the pediatric population in Denmark.
    Polcwiartek LB; Polcwiartek C; Andersen MP; Østergaard L; Broccia MD; Gislason GH; Køber L; Torp-Pedersen C; Schou M; Fosbøl E; Kragholm K; Hagstrøm S
    Eur J Pediatr; 2021 Jun; 180(6):1955-1963. PubMed ID: 33555426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Self-sampling in Human Papillomavirus screening during and post-COVID-19 pandemic.
    Tan CS; Hamzah ND; Ismail ZHF; Jerip AR; Kipli M
    Med J Malaysia; 2021 May; 76(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 34031326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cancer screening programmes in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an update of a nationwide survey on activity volumes and delayed diagnoses.
    Battisti F; Falini P; Gorini G; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Armaroli P; Giubilato P; Giorgi Rossi P; Zorzi M; Battagello J; Senore C; Zappa M; Mantellini P
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2022; 58(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 35324470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Aitken CA; van Agt HME; Siebers AG; van Kemenade FJ; Niesters HGM; Melchers WJG; Vedder JEM; Schuurman R; van den Brule AJC; van der Linden HC; Hinrichs JWJ; Molijn A; Hoogduin KJ; van Hemel BM; de Kok IMCM
    BMC Med; 2019 Dec; 17(1):228. PubMed ID: 31829241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preterm birth, stillbirth and early neonatal mortality during the Danish COVID-19 lockdown.
    Hedley PL; Hedermann G; Hagen CM; Bækvad-Hansen M; Hjalgrim H; Rostgaard K; Laksafoss AD; Hoffmann S; Jensen JS; Breindahl M; Melbye M; Hviid A; Hougaard DM; Krebs L; Lausten-Thomsen U; Christiansen M
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Mar; 181(3):1175-1184. PubMed ID: 34783897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Non-participation in screening: the case of cervical cancer in Denmark.
    Dugué PA; Lynge E; Bjerregaard B; Rebolj M
    Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):266-9. PubMed ID: 22300964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Benefits and potential harms of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening: A real-world comparison of HPV testing versus cytology.
    Thomsen LT; Kjaer SK; Munk C; Ørnskov D; Waldstrøm M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Mar; 100(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 33566361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Low adherence to cervical cancer screening after subtotal hysterectomy.
    Andersen LL; Møller LM; Gimbel HM
    Dan Med J; 2015 Dec; 62(12):A5165. PubMed ID: 26621394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [HPV-Hr detection by home self sampling in women not compliant with pap test for cervical cancer screening. Results of a pilot programme in Bouches-du-Rhône].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Le Retraite L; Heid P; Tamalet C; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2011 Jul; 98(7):723-31. PubMed ID: 21700548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. COVID-19 and inequities in colorectal and cervical cancer screening and diagnosis in Washington State.
    Amram O; Amiri S; Robison J; Pflugeisen CM; Monsivais P
    Cancer Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):2990-2998. PubMed ID: 35304835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Incidence of cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer in women living with HIV in Denmark: comparison with the general population.
    Thorsteinsson K; Ladelund S; Jensen-Fangel S; Katzenstein TL; Johansen IS; Pedersen G; Junge J; Helleberg M; Storgaard M; Obel N; Lebech AM
    HIV Med; 2016 Jan; 17(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 26058995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Self-assessed health, perceived stress and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study.
    Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Vedsted P
    Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():392-8. PubMed ID: 26494608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrants: a registry-based study of 1.4 million women in Norway.
    Leinonen MK; Campbell S; Ursin G; Tropé A; Nygård M
    Eur J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 27(5):873-879. PubMed ID: 28957477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Concurrent participation in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in the Netherlands.
    Kregting LM; Olthof EMG; Breekveldt ECH; Aitken CA; Heijnsdijk EAM; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT
    Eur J Cancer; 2022 Nov; 175():180-186. PubMed ID: 36126478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Japanese cancer screening programs during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes in participation between 2017-2020.
    Machii R; Takahashi H
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 82():102313. PubMed ID: 36508964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of scheduled appointments on cervical screening participation in Norway: a randomised intervention.
    Lönnberg S; Andreassen T; Engesæter B; Lilleng R; Kleven C; Skare A; Johansson K; Fredheim CS; Tropé A
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013728. PubMed ID: 28186949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study.
    Pallesen AVJ; Herrstedt J; Westendorp RGJ; Mortensen LH; Kristiansen M
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):323-332. PubMed ID: 33427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.