179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36662327)
1. Characterization of cervical tissue using Mueller matrix polarimetry.
Khan S; Qadir M; Khalid A; Ashraf S; Ahmad I
Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Jan; 38(1):46. PubMed ID: 36662327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Mueller matrix colposcopy in the characterization of cervical collagen anisotropy.
Chue-Sang J; Holness N; Gonzalez M; Greaves J; Saytashev I; Stoff S; Gandjbakhche A; Chernomordik V; Burkett G; Ramella-Roman J
J Biomed Opt; 2018 Aug; 23(12):1-9. PubMed ID: 30088376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mueller matrix imaging for collagen scoring in mice model of pregnancy.
Lee HR; Saytashev I; Du Le VN; Mahendroo M; Ramella-Roman J; Novikova T
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15621. PubMed ID: 34341418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Mueller matrix polarimetry and optical coherence tomography in the characterization of cervical collagen anisotropy.
Chue-Sang J; Bai Y; Stoff S; Gonzalez M; Holness N; Gomes J; Jung R; Gandjbakhche A; Chernomordik VV; Ramella-Roman JC
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 28853246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ex vivo Mueller polarimetric imaging of the uterine cervix: a first statistical evaluation.
Rehbinder J; Haddad H; Deby S; Teig B; Nazac A; Novikova T; Pierangelo A; Moreau F
J Biomed Opt; 2016 Jul; 21(7):71113. PubMed ID: 27108592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mueller matrix-based characterization of cervical tissue sections: a quantitative comparison of polar and differential decomposition methods.
Kumar N; Kumar Nayak J; Pradhan A; Ghosh N
J Biomed Opt; 2024 May; 29(5):052916. PubMed ID: 38328279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polarimetric imaging for cervical pre-cancer screening aided by machine learning:
Robinson D; Hoong K; Kleijn WB; Doronin A; Rehbinder J; Vizet J; Pierangelo A; Novikova T
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102904. PubMed ID: 37425429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of anisotropy of collagen structures through spatial frequencies of Mueller matrix images for cervical pre-cancer detection.
Zaffar M; Pradhan A
Appl Opt; 2020 Feb; 59(4):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 32225267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mueller-matrix imaging polarimetry elevated by wavelet decomposition and polarization-singular processing for analysis of specific cancerous tissue pathology.
Sdobnov A; Ushenko VA; Trifonyuk L; Bakun O; Garazdyuk M; Soltys IV; Dubolazov O; Ushenko OG; Ushenko YA; Bykov A; Meglinski I
J Biomed Opt; 2023 Oct; 28(10):102903. PubMed ID: 37425430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different orders of scattering through time-resolved Mueller matrix imaging estimates of pre-malignancy in human cervical tissues.
Zaffar M; Sahoo GR; Pradhan A
Appl Opt; 2020 May; 59(14):4286-4295. PubMed ID: 32400404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of tissue polarimetric properties using Stokes polarimetric imaging with circularly polarized illumination.
Qi J; He H; Lin J; Dong Y; Chen D; Ma H; Elson DS
J Biophotonics; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e201700139. PubMed ID: 29131523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and implementation of a portable colposcope Mueller matrix polarimeter.
Gonzalez M; Montejo KA; Krupp K; Srinivas V; DeHoog E; Madhivanan P; Ramella-Roman JC
J Biomed Opt; 2020 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 33191686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depolarization imaging for fast and non-invasive monitoring of cervical microstructure remodeling in vivo during pregnancy.
Rehbinder J; Vizet J; Park J; Ossikovski R; Vanel JC; Nazac A; Pierangelo A
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12321. PubMed ID: 35853917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential Mueller matrix imaging of partially depolarizing optically anisotropic biological tissues.
Trifonyuk L; Sdobnov A; Baranowski W; Ushenko V; Olar O; Dubolazov A; Pidkamin L; Sidor M; Vanchuliak O; Motrich A; Gorsky M; Meglinski I
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):877-891. PubMed ID: 31749042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo imaging of uterine cervix with a Mueller polarimetric colposcope.
Vizet J; Rehbinder J; Deby S; Roussel S; Nazac A; Soufan R; Genestie C; Haie-Meder C; Fernandez H; Moreau F; Pierangelo A
Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):2471. PubMed ID: 28572602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrinsic fluorescence for cervical precancer detection using polarized light based in-house fabricated portable device.
Meena BL; Singh P; Sah AN; Pandey K; Agarwal A; Pantola C; Pradhan A
J Biomed Opt; 2018 Jan; 23(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29341542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing colon cancer stages through optical polarimetry-assisted digital staining.
Sharma M; Unni SN; Shaji C; Balasubramanian S; Sundaram S
Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Feb; 39(1):59. PubMed ID: 38336913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical techniques for cervical neoplasia detection.
Novikova T
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2017; 8():1844-1862. PubMed ID: 29046833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polarized light imaging in biomedicine: emerging Mueller matrix methodologies for bulk tissue assessment.
Alali S; Vitkin A
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Jun; 20(6):61104. PubMed ID: 25793658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Does the use of gestation-specific centiles for cervical length change the management of pregnancies at risk of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth?".
O'Reilly P; Dakin A; Keating N; Luethe L; Corcoran S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():349-352. PubMed ID: 34385081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
