155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3666444)
41. The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
Genetics; 2005 Dec; 171(4):2097-112. PubMed ID: 16118193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Pleiotropic mutation, modularity and evolvability.
Griswold CK
Evol Dev; 2006; 8(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 16409385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Engrailed gene dosage determines whether certain recessive cubitus interruptus alleles exhibit dominance of the adult wing phenotype in Drosophila.
Locke J; Hanna S
Dev Genet; 1996; 19(4):340-9. PubMed ID: 9023986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. On the evolution of dominance modifiers I. A nonlinear analysis.
Bürger R
J Theor Biol; 1983 Apr; 101(4):585-98. PubMed ID: 6876834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Estimating within-locus nonadditive coefficient and discriminating dominance versus overdominance as the genetic cause of heterosis.
Deng HW
Genetics; 1998 Apr; 148(4):2003-14. PubMed ID: 9560413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex.
Chasnov JR
Genetics; 2000 Nov; 156(3):1419-25. PubMed ID: 11063713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. On the dominance ratio. 1922.
Fisher RA
Bull Math Biol; 1990; 52(1-2):297-318; discussion 201-7. PubMed ID: 2185862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution.
Chevin LM; Martin G; Lenormand T
Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3213-31. PubMed ID: 20662921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Tumour p53 mutations exhibit promoter selective dominance over wild type p53.
Monti P; Campomenosi P; Ciribilli Y; Iannone R; Inga A; Abbondandolo A; Resnick MA; Fronza G
Oncogene; 2002 Mar; 21(11):1641-8. PubMed ID: 11896595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The population genetics of alleles affecting enzyme activity.
Hastings IM
J Theor Biol; 1992 Aug; 157(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 1465018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. R factor-mediated tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli K12. Dominance of some tetracycline sensitive mutants and relief of dominance by deletion.
Foster TJ
Mol Gen Genet; 1976 Feb; 143(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 765766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dominance--one hundred and fifteen years after Mendel's paper.
Porteous JW
J Theor Biol; 1996 Oct; 182(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 8944153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer.
Szathmáry E
Genetics; 1993 Jan; 133(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8417983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.
Anderson RJ; Spencer HG
Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1949-58. PubMed ID: 10581298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fine-mapping additive and dominant SNP effects using group-LASSO and fractional resample model averaging.
Sabourin J; Nobel AB; Valdar W
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 39(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 25417853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Heterozygote advantage: the effect of artificial selection in livestock and pets.
Hedrick PW
J Hered; 2015; 106(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 25524994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaning gain in the U.S. Limousin population.
Gengler N; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Culbertson MS
J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2515-20. PubMed ID: 9814888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Frequency of private electrophoretic variants and indirect estimates of mutation rate in Papua New Guinea.
Bhatia KK; Blake NM; Serjeantson SW; Kirk RL
Am J Hum Genet; 1981 Jan; 33(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 7468589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The contribution of dominance to phenotype prediction in a pine breeding and simulated population.
de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JF; E Silva FF; de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; Resende MF
Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Jul; 117(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27118156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
