These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3666560)

  • 1. Electrodes for 24 hours pH monitoring--a comparative study.
    McLauchlan G; Rawlings JM; Lucas ML; McCloy RF; Crean GP; McColl KE
    Gut; 1987 Aug; 28(8):935-9. PubMed ID: 3666560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of glass and antimony electrodes for continuous oesophageal pH monitoring.
    Vandenplas Y; Helven R; Goyvaerts H
    Gut; 1991 Jun; 32(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 2060881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass and antimony electrodes for oesophageal pH monitoring in distressed infants: how different are they?
    Vandenplas Y; Badriul H; Verghote M; Hauser B; Kaufman L
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Nov; 16(12):1325-30. PubMed ID: 15618840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antimony and glass pH electrodes can be used interchangeably in 24-hour studies of gastric acidity.
    Mela GS; Savarino V; Moretti M; Sumberaz A; Bonifacino G; Zentilin P; Caputo E; Villa G; Celle G
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Dec; 35(12):1473-81. PubMed ID: 2253532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) pH electrode: a new sensor for long term ambulatory pH monitoring.
    Duroux P; Emde C; Bauerfeind P; Francis C; Grisel A; Thybaud L; Arstrong D; Depeursinge C; Blum AL
    Gut; 1991 Mar; 32(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 2013417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vitro and in-vivo comparative analysis of four tissue pH monitoring systems.
    Muller P; Peura RA; Mendelson Y; Kun S; Dunn RM
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(6):656-67. PubMed ID: 9883350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: a comparison between antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrodes.
    Hemmink GJ; Weusten BL; Oors J; Bredenoord AJ; Timmer R; Smout AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 22(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 20009939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identical 24-hour gastric pH profiles when using intragastric antimony or glass electrodes or aspirated gastric juice.
    Andersen J; Naesdal J; Ström M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1988 Apr; 23(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 3387903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Basic principles of pH registration.
    Emde C; Hopert R; Riecken EO
    Neth J Med; 1989 Mar; 34 Suppl():S3-9. PubMed ID: 2725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: experience in The Netherlands.
    Klinkenberg-Knol EC; Ogilvie AC; Meuwissen SG
    Neth J Med; 1989 Mar; 34 Suppl():S40-54. PubMed ID: 2657460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.
    Opekun AR; Smith JL; Graham DY
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Aug; 35(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 2384040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-test calibration of single-use, antimony, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH probes is necessary.
    Wise JL; Kammer PK; Murray JA
    Dig Dis Sci; 2004 Apr; 49(4):688-92. PubMed ID: 15185879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of three electrodes for the measurement of pH in small volumes.
    Smit A; Pollard M; Cleaton-Jones P; Preston A
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8955996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrochemical aspects of pH electrodes.
    Emde C
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 2225514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multipoint micro antimony pH electrode for tissue surface measurements.
    Lund N; Sjöberg F; Guldbrand H; Walfridsson H; Edwall G
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1984; 1(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 6546135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a miniature antimony electrode for measurement of myocardial pH.
    Rosenfeldt FL; Ou R; Smith JA; Mulcahy DE; Bannigan JT; Haskard MR
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 10561822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slimline vs. glass pH electrodes: what degree of accuracy should we expect?
    Pandolfino JE; Ghosh S; Zhang Q; Heath M; Bombeck T; Kahrilas PJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Jan; 23(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16393314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new catheter for esophageal pH monitoring.
    Kuit JA; Schepel SJ; Bijleveld CM; Kleibeuker JH
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1991 Feb; 38(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 2026394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.