137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36668994)
1. The Surgical Learning Curve: Does Robotic Technical Skill Explain Differences in Operative Performance?
Bitner DP; Kutana S; Carsky K; Addison P; DeChario SP; Antonacci A; Mikhail D; Yatco E; Chung PJ; Filicori F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 May; 33(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 36668994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Relationship Between Technical Skills, Cognitive Workload, and Errors During Robotic Surgical Exercises.
Roberts SI; Cen SY; Nguyen JH; Perez LC; Medina LG; Ma R; Marshall S; Kocielnik R; Anandkumar A; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 34913734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between operative time and crowd-sourced skills assessment for robotic bariatric surgery.
Addison P; Yoo A; Duarte-Ramos J; Addy J; Dechario S; Husk G; Jarrett M; Teixeira J; Antonacci A; Filicori F
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5303-5309. PubMed ID: 32970207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Surgeon Experience Correlate with Crowd-Sourced Skill Assessment in Robotic Bariatric Surgery?
Addison P; Bitner DP; Addy J; Dechario S; Husk G; Antonacci A; Talamini M; Giangola G; Filicori F
Am Surg; 2023 Dec; 89(12):5253-5262. PubMed ID: 36454236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).
Aghazadeh MA; Jayaratna IS; Hung AJ; Pan MM; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3261-6. PubMed ID: 25609318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vargas MV; Moawad G; Denny K; Happ L; Misa NY; Margulies S; Opoku-Anane J; Abi Khalil E; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):420-425. PubMed ID: 28027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Blinded intraoperative skill evaluations avoid gender-based bias.
Addison P; Bitner D; Chung P; Kutana S; Dechario S; Husk G; Jarrett M; Teixeira J; Antonacci A; Filicori F
Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8458-8462. PubMed ID: 35199203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the "Assistant Effect" in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP): Measures of Technical Performance.
Yu N; Saadat H; Finelli A; Lee JY; Singal RK; Grantcharov TP; Goldenberg MG
J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():307-314. PubMed ID: 33370599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual Reality Simulation Has Weak Correlation with Overall Trainee Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performance.
Berges AJ; Vedula SS; Malpani A; Chen CCG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Apr; 29(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 34896658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cognitive training for technical and non-technical skills in robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial.
Raison N; Ahmed K; Abe T; Brunckhorst O; Novara G; Buffi N; McIlhenny C; van der Poel H; van Hemelrijck M; Gavazzi A; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1075-1081. PubMed ID: 29733492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a technical checklist for the assessment of suturing in robotic surgery.
Guni A; Raison N; Challacombe B; Khan S; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4402-4407. PubMed ID: 30194643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hung AJ; Chen J; Jarc A; Hatcher D; Djaladat H; Gill IS
J Urol; 2018 Jan; 199(1):296-304. PubMed ID: 28765067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative robotic-assisted low anterior rectal resection performance assessment using procedure-specific binary metrics and a global rating scale.
Gómez Ruiz M; Tou S; Gallagher AG; Cagigas Fernández C; Cristobal Poch L; Matzel KE
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35543264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?
Mills JT; Hougen HY; Bitner D; Krupski TL; Schenkman NS
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1052-1056. PubMed ID: 28623113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An objective approach to evaluate novice robotic surgeons using a combination of kinematics and stepwise cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses.
Lyman WB; Passeri MJ; Murphy K; Siddiqui IA; Khan AS; Iannitti DA; Martinie JB; Baker EH; Vrochides D
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2765-2772. PubMed ID: 32556751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).
Sánchez R; Rodríguez O; Rosciano J; Vegas L; Bond V; Rojas A; Sanchez-Ismayel A
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 27039189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in the assessment of basic robotic surgical skills.
Gorard J; Boal M; Swamynathan V; Ghamrawi W; Francis N
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jan; 38(1):116-128. PubMed ID: 37932602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crowdsourced versus expert evaluations of the vesico-urethral anastomosis in the robotic radical prostatectomy: is one superior at discriminating differences in automated performance metrics?
Oh PJ; Chen J; Hatcher D; Djaladat H; Hung AJ
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):705-711. PubMed ID: 29713932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal variability of surgical technical skill perception in real robotic surgery.
Kelly JD; Nash M; Heller N; Lendvay TS; Kowalewski TM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Dec; 15(12):2101-2107. PubMed ID: 32860549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
