204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36669095)
1. Development of
Lorenz K; Preem L; Sagor K; Putrinš M; Tenson T; Kogermann K
Mol Pharm; 2023 Feb; 20(2):1230-1246. PubMed ID: 36669095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions between Chloramphenicol, Carrier Polymers, and Bacteria-Implications for Designing Electrospun Drug Delivery Systems Countering Wound Infection.
Preem L; Mahmoudzadeh M; Putrinš M; Meos A; Laidmäe I; Romann T; Aruväli J; Härmas R; Koivuniemi A; Bunker A; Tenson T; Kogermann K
Mol Pharm; 2017 Dec; 14(12):4417-4430. PubMed ID: 29099601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biofilm inhibitory and eradicating activity of wound care products against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in an in vitro chronic wound model.
Brackman G; De Meyer L; Nelis HJ; Coenye T
J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jun; 114(6):1833-42. PubMed ID: 23490006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model.
Pati BA; Kurata WE; Horseman TS; Pierce LM
Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of internally validated
Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
Phillips PL; Yang Q; Davis S; Sampson EM; Azeke JI; Hamad A; Schultz GS
Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrospun Zein/PCL Fibrous Matrices Release Tetracycline in a Controlled Manner, Killing Staphylococcus aureus Both in Biofilms and Ex Vivo on Pig Skin, and are Compatible with Human Skin Cells.
Alhusein N; Blagbrough IS; Beeton ML; Bolhuis A; De Bank PA
Pharm Res; 2016 Jan; 33(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 26337770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanofiber Dressings Topically Delivering Molecularly Engineered Human Cathelicidin Peptides for the Treatment of Biofilms in Chronic Wounds.
Su Y; Wang H; Mishra B; Lakshmaiah Narayana J; Jiang J; Reilly DA; Hollins RR; Carlson MA; Wang G; Xie J
Mol Pharm; 2019 May; 16(5):2011-2020. PubMed ID: 30916573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing.
Parsons D; Meredith K; Rowlands VJ; Short D; Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7616471. PubMed ID: 27990437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
Kim H; Izadjoo M
J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro prevention and inactivation of biofilms using controlled-release iodine foam dressings for wound healing.
Watson F; Chen R; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2024 Jan; 21(1):e14365. PubMed ID: 37715349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synergistic antibacterial and antifouling wound dressings: Integration of photothermal-activated no release and zwitterionic surface modification.
Li YH; Huang ZJ; Zhang JQ; Ye MN; Jun M; Wang W; Chen XL; Wang GH
Int J Pharm; 2024 May; 657():124160. PubMed ID: 38663642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Curcumin-loaded electrospun polycaprolactone/montmorillonite nanocomposite: wound dressing application with anti-bacterial and low cell toxicity properties.
Sadeghianmaryan A; Yazdanpanah Z; Soltani YA; Sardroud HA; Nasirtabrizi MH; Chen X
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2020 Feb; 31(2):169-187. PubMed ID: 31609684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of biofilm-targeted antimicrobial wound dressing for the treatment of chronic wound infections.
Ng SF; Leow HL
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015; 41(11):1902-9. PubMed ID: 25758412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antibiofilm activity of promethazine, deferiprone, and Manuka honey in an ex vivo wound model.
Guedes GMM; Freitas AS; Pinheiro RM; Pereira VC; Melgarejo CMA; de Araujo ES; Ribeiro KVC; Bandeira SP; Cordeiro RA; Rocha MFG; Sidrim JJC; Castelo-Branco DSCM
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 76(10):. PubMed ID: 37791895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
Tran PL; Hamood AN; de Souza A; Schultz G; Liesenfeld B; Mehta D; Reid TW
Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
