327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36670332)
1. Population-Based Screening Using Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations.
Behr CM; Oude Wolcherink MJ; IJzerman MJ; Vliegenthart R; Koffijberg H
Pharmacoeconomics; 2023 Apr; 41(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 36670332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Snowsill T; Yang H; Griffin E; Long L; Varley-Campbell J; Coelho H; Robinson S; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(69):1-276. PubMed ID: 30518460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography.
Grover H; King W; Bhattarai N; Moloney E; Sharp L; Fuller L
Lung Cancer; 2022 Aug; 170():20-33. PubMed ID: 35700629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of Low-Dose Computed Tomography With a Plasma-Based Biomarker for Lung Cancer Screening in China.
Zhao Z; Wang Y; Wu W; Yang Y; Du L; Dong H
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2213634. PubMed ID: 35608858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic literature review.
Puggina A; Broumas A; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26370440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness and health impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography for never smokers in Japan and the United States: a modelling study.
Kowada A
BMC Pulm Med; 2022 Jan; 22(1):19. PubMed ID: 34996423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Lung Cancer Screening Strategies Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography: a Systematic Review.
Raymakers AJN; Mayo J; Lam S; FitzGerald JM; Whitehurst DGT; Lynd LD
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):409-418. PubMed ID: 26873091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening worldwide: a systematic review].
Liu CC; Shi JF; Liu GX; Tang W; Zhang X; Li F; Wang L; Ma Y; Su K; Zhao SJ; Gao YB; Li N; Chen WQ; Wu N; Dai M
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 40(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 30744276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: National expenditures and cost-effectiveness.
Zeng X; Zhou Z; Luo X; Liu Q
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():977550. PubMed ID: 36249202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of a low-dose computed tomography screening programme for lung cancer in New Zealand.
Jaine R; Kvizhinadze G; Nair N; Blakely T
Lung Cancer; 2018 Oct; 124():233-240. PubMed ID: 30268467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wattson DA; Hunink MG; DiPiro PJ; Das P; Hodgson DC; Mauch PM; Ng AK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 25104066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kumar V; Cohen JT; van Klaveren D; Soeteman DI; Wong JB; Neumann PJ; Kent DM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Feb; 168(3):161-169. PubMed ID: 29297005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Jonas DE; Reuland DS; Reddy SM; Nagle M; Clark SD; Weber RP; Enyioha C; Malo TL; Brenner AT; Armstrong C; Coker-Schwimmer M; Middleton JC; Voisin C; Harris RP
JAMA; 2021 Mar; 325(10):971-987. PubMed ID: 33687468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional Computed Tomographic Calcium Scoring vs full chest CTCS for lung cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Jiang B; Linden PA; Gupta A; Jarrett C; Worrell SG; Ho VP; Perry Y; Towe CW;
BMC Pulm Med; 2020 Jul; 20(1):187. PubMed ID: 32631384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we increase efficiency of CT lung cancer screening by combining with CVD and COPD screening? Results of an early economic evaluation.
Behr CM; Koffijberg H; Degeling K; Vliegenthart R; IJzerman MJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3067-3075. PubMed ID: 34973103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biennial lung cancer screening in Canada with smoking cessation-outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
Lung Cancer; 2016 Nov; 101():98-103. PubMed ID: 27794416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
