135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3667272)
1. An improved environmental pathway model for assessing high-level waste repository risks.
Malbrain CM; Lester RK
Health Phys; 1987 Nov; 53(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 3667272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Source term evaluation model for high-level radioactive waste repository with decay chain build-up.
Chopra M; Sunny F; Oza RB
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2016 Sep; 51(11):989-95. PubMed ID: 27337157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of low and intermediate-level radioactive waste on humans and the environment over the next one hundred thousand years.
Kautsky U; Saetre P; Berglund S; Jaeschke B; Nordén S; Brandefelt J; Keesmann S; Näslund JO; Andersson E
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Jan; 151 Pt 2():395-403. PubMed ID: 26183806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of 14C and 228Ra in terms of the proposed Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste repository.
Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Cherry RN; Sun LS
Health Phys; 2006 Sep; 91(3):238-48. PubMed ID: 16891899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland.
Brennwald MS; van Dorp F
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19560845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the impact of climate change in Germany with biosphere models for long-term safety assessment of nuclear waste repositories.
Staudt C; Semiochkina N; Kaiser JC; Pröhl G
J Environ Radioact; 2013 Jan; 115():214-23. PubMed ID: 22742772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a terrestrial food-chain model using natural analogs.
Kocher DC
Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 3804747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository.
Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J
Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance assessment of radioactive waste repositories.
Campbell JE; Cranwell RM
Science; 1988 Mar; 239(4846):1389-92. PubMed ID: 3279510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Worker and environmental protection issues in the remediation of an abandoned source manufacturing facility.
Hoffman DE
Health Phys; 2003 Feb; 84(2 Suppl):S30-6. PubMed ID: 12564344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues concerning EPA's cost/benefit analyses of radiological cleanup criteria.
Van Verst SP; Wells DP; Garcia NB
Health Phys; 1997 Sep; 73(3):527-30. PubMed ID: 9287099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Generic performance assessment for a deep repository for low and intermediate level waste in the UK--a case study in assessing radiological impacts on the natural environment.
Jones SR; Patton D; Copplestone D; Norris S; O'Sullivan P
J Environ Radioact; 2003; 66(1-2):89-119. PubMed ID: 12590072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model for evaluating radiological impacts on organisms other than man for use in post-closure assessments of geological repositories for radioactive wastes.
Thorn MC; Kelly M; Rees JH; Sánchez-Friera P; Calvez M
J Radiol Prot; 2002 Sep; 22(3):249-77. PubMed ID: 12375788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental impact of radionuclide migration in groundwater from a low-intermediate level radioactive waste repository.
Wang JS; Yang ZF; Li SS; Wang ZM
J Environ Sci (China); 2001 Apr; 13(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 11590738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compliance and policy issues and recommendations related to revision of the National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Radionuclides.
Regnier JE; Blanchard R; Carter MW; Cowan E; Martin J; Sullivan R
Health Phys; 1985 May; 48(5):695-9. PubMed ID: 3988527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Geochemical evaluation of different groundwater-host rock systems for radioactive waste disposal.
Metz V; Kienzler B; Schüssler W
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar; 61(1-4):265-79. PubMed ID: 12598109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contribution to a more realistic approach in assessing the release of C-14 from low-level radioactive waste repositories.
Bracke G; Müller W
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19022527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An analytically based model for the simultaneous leaching-chain decay of radionuclides from contaminated ground surface soil layers.
Jarzemba MS; Manteufel RD
Health Phys; 1997 Dec; 73(6):919-27. PubMed ID: 9373070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between the example reference biosphere model ERB 2B and a process-based model: simulation of a natural release scenario.
Almahayni T
J Environ Radioact; 2014 Dec; 138():279-88. PubMed ID: 25306104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.
; Weiss W; Larsson CM; McKenney C; Minon JP; Mobbs S; Schneider T; Umeki H; Hilden W; Pescatore C; Vesterlind M
Ann ICRP; 2013 Jun; 42(3):1-57. PubMed ID: 23639723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
