These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36673094)

  • 1. Head-to-Head Comparison of Nasopharyngeal, Oropharyngeal and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing.
    Larsen KD; Jensen MM; Homøe AS; Arndal E; Samuelsen GB; Koch A; Nielsen XC; Homøe P; Todsen T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36673094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nasopharyngeal Swabs Are More Sensitive Than Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 Load.
    Wang H; Liu Q; Hu J; Zhou M; Yu MQ; Li KY; Xu D; Xiao Y; Yang JY; Lu YJ; Wang F; Yin P; Xu SY
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2020; 7():334. PubMed ID: 32626720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of nasopharyngeal, midturbinate nasal and oropharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Berenger BM; Fonseca K; Schneider AR; Hu J; Zelyas N
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2022 Apr; 102(4):115618. PubMed ID: 35007959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal, Oropharyngeal, Nasal Swabs, and Saliva for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Direct RT-PCR.
    Kiryanov SA; Levina TA; Kadochnikova VV; Konopleva MV; Suslov AP; Trofimov DY
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35626247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Salivary SARS-CoV-2 RNA for diagnosis of COVID-19 patients: a systematic revisew and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
    Caixeta DC; Paranhos LR; Blumenberg C; Garcia-Júnior MA; Guevara-Vega M; Taveira EB; Nunes MAC; Cunha TM; Jardim ACG; Flores-Mir C; Sabino-Silva R
    Jpn Dent Sci Rev; 2023 Jun; 59():219-38. PubMed ID: 37360001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of SARS-Cov-2 Infection by RT-PCR Using Specimens Other Than Naso- and Oropharyngeal Swabs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Moreira VM; Mascarenhas P; Machado V; Botelho J; Mendes JJ; Taveira N; Almeida MG
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33670020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal wash specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection in the setting of sampling device shortage.
    Calame A; Mazza L; Renzoni A; Kaiser L; Schibler M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Feb; 40(2):441-445. PubMed ID: 32939576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.
    Oliver J; Tosif S; Lee LY; Costa AM; Bartel C; Last K; Clifford V; Daley A; Allard N; Orr C; Nind A; Alexander K; Meagher N; Sait M; Ballard SA; Williams E; Bond K; Williamson DA; Crawford NW; Gibney KB
    Med J Aust; 2021 Sep; 215(6):273-278. PubMed ID: 34287935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective population-level validation of the Abbott ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 device implemented in multiple settings for testing asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.
    Stokes W; Venner AA; Buss E; Tipples G; Berenger BM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2023 Feb; 29(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 36096431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.
    Sun Q; Li J; Ren H; Pastor L; Loginova Y; Madej R; Taylor K; Wong JK; Zhang Z; Zhang A; Lu CM; Sha MY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0243183. PubMed ID: 33621263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in HHT patients: nasopharyngeal versus oropharyngeal swab.
    Pagella F; Lizzio R; Ugolini S; Spinozzi G; Maiorano E; Suppressa P; Sabbà C; Matti E
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2020 Dec; 15(1):350. PubMed ID: 33339521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) on Self-Collected Nasal Swab Compared With Professionally Collected Nasopharyngeal Swab.
    Mannan N; Raihan R; Parvin US; Fazle Akbar SM; Reza MS; Islam S; Kundu J; Noman AA; Fakhruddin M; Billaha M; Anik M; Hasan T; Tudu N; Rahim A; Mim F; Rahman Khan MJ
    Cureus; 2022 Jun; 14(6):e25618. PubMed ID: 35784954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.
    Patriquin G; LeBlanc JJ; Williams C; Hatchette TF; Ross J; Barrett L; Davidson R
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0245521. PubMed ID: 35171010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gargle lavage as a viable alternative to swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Mittal A; Gupta A; Kumar S; Surjit M; Singh B; Soneja M; Soni KD; Khan AR; Singh K; Naik S; Kumar A; Aggarwal R; Nischal N; Sinha S; Trikha A; Wig N
    Indian J Med Res; 2020 Jul & Aug; 152(1 & 2):77-81. PubMed ID: 32820725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.
    Uddin MKM; Shirin T; Hossain ME; Alam AN; Ami JQ; Hasan R; Miah M; Shaly NJ; Ahmed S; Rahman SMM; Rahman M; Banu S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0046821. PubMed ID: 34730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Detection from Saliva Sampling and Oropharyngeal Swab.
    Clemmensen ML; Bendixen KK; Flugt K; Pilgaard P; Christensen UB
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0142222. PubMed ID: 36129278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: A multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab.
    Kandel CE; Young M; Serbanescu MA; Powis JE; Bulir D; Callahan J; Katz K; McCready J; Racher H; Sheldrake E; Quon D; Vojdani OK; McGeer A; Goneau LW; Vermeiren C
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 42(11):1340-1344. PubMed ID: 33436122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.
    Liu M; Li Q; Zhou J; Ai W; Zheng X; Zeng J; Liu Y; Xiang X; Guo R; Li X; Wu X; Xu H; Jiang L; Zhang H; Chen J; Tian L; Luo J; Luo C
    J Virol Methods; 2020 Dec; 286():113974. PubMed ID: 32949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of various clinical specimens in detection of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR in new and follow up cases of COVID-19 infection: Quest for the best choice.
    Sharma K; Aggarwala P; Gandhi D; Mathias A; Singh P; Sharma S; Negi SS; Bhargava A; Das P; Gaikwad U; Wankhede A; Behra A; Nagarkar NM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249408. PubMed ID: 33819290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Saliva is a reliable, non-invasive specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
    Vaz SN; Santana DS; Netto EM; Pedroso C; Wang WK; Santos FDA; Brites C
    Braz J Infect Dis; 2020; 24(5):422-427. PubMed ID: 32888905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.