These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36673307)

  • 1. Image Registration for Visualizing Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing under Different Orientations of Magnetization.
    Li S; Zhang J; Liu G; Chen N; Tian L; Bai L; Chen C
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing.
    Feng B; Wu J; Tu H; Tang J; Kang Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanism of Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection Method Based on the Slotted Ferromagnetic Lift-Off Layer.
    Tang J; Wang R; Qiu G; Hu Y; Kang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Lift-Off-Tolerant Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Method for Drill Pipes at Wellhead.
    Wu J; Fang H; Li L; Wang J; Huang X; Kang Y; Sun Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal extraction using complementary ensemble empirical mode in pipeline magnetic flux leakage nondestructive evaluation.
    Shi M; Zhao H; Huang Z; Liu Q
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Jul; 90(7):075101. PubMed ID: 31370475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing and Artificial Neural Network Pattern Recognition-Based Automated Damage Detection and Quantification for Wire Rope Non-Destructive Evaluation.
    Kim JW; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29301294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on the Analytical Model of Improved Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal for the Local Stress Concentration Zone of Pipelines.
    Yang L; Zheng F; Huang P; Bai S; Su Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention Module Magnetic Flux Leakage Linked Deep Residual Network for Pipeline In-Line Inspection.
    Liu S; Wang H; Li R
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature and Intensity Based Medical Image Registration Using Particle Swarm Optimization.
    Abdel-Basset M; Fakhry AE; El-Henawy I; Qiu T; Sangaiah AK
    J Med Syst; 2017 Nov; 41(12):197. PubMed ID: 29098445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defect Width Assessment Based on the Near-Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Method.
    Li E; Chen Y; Chen X; Wu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Online MFL Sensing Method for Steel Pipe Based on the Magnetic Guiding Effect.
    Wu J; Fang H; Huang X; Xia H; Kang Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification method of tubing defects based on machine learning algorithm and magnetic flux leakage signals.
    Shi M; Ni M; Qin L; Liang Y; Huang Z
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2023 Jan; 94(1):015111. PubMed ID: 36725586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defect profile estimation from magnetic flux leakage signal via efficient managing particle swarm optimization.
    Han W; Xu J; Wang P; Tian G
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Jun; 14(6):10361-80. PubMed ID: 24926693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanism of Magnetic Permeability Perturbation in Magnetizing-Based Eddy Current Nondestructive Testing.
    Deng Z; Yu Z; Yuan Z; Song X; Kang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative Study on MFL Signal of Pipeline Composite Defect Based on Improved Magnetic Charge Model.
    Liu B; Luo N; Feng G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34068412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theory and Application of Magnetic Flux Leakage Pipeline Detection.
    Shi Y; Zhang C; Li R; Cai M; Jia G
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31036-55. PubMed ID: 26690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Inspection of Remanence of Broken Wire Rope Based on Compressed Sensing.
    Zhang J; Tan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Aug; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 27571077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Signal Characteristics of Oil and Gas Pipeline Leakage Detection Based on Magneto-Mechanical Effects.
    Liu B; Ge Q; Wu Z; Lian Z; Yang L; Geng H
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phase-Extraction-Based MFL Testing for Subsurface Defect in Ferromagnetic Steel Plate.
    Ma C; Liu Y; Shen C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast estimation of defect profiles from the magnetic flux leakage signal based on a multi-power affine projection algorithm.
    Han W; Shen X; Xu J; Wang P; Tian G; Wu Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Sep; 14(9):16454-66. PubMed ID: 25192314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.