146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36675370)
21. The fetal-pelvic index: a method of identifying fetal-pelvic disproportion in women attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery.
Thurnau GR; Scates DH; Morgan MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 165(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 1872337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The diagnostic accuracy of pelvic measurements: threshold values and fetal size.
Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):643-8. PubMed ID: 24816688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. First delivery after cesarean delivery for strictly defined cephalopelvic disproportion.
Impey L; O'Herlihy C
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 92(5):799-803. PubMed ID: 9794672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital.
Fox LK; Huerta-Enochian GS; Hamlin JA; Katz VL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1679-85; discussion 1685-8. PubMed ID: 15284768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon.
Rozenholc AT; Ako SN; Leke RJ; Boulvain M
BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 17439570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is X-ray pelvimetry useful in a trial of labour after caesarean section?
Lao TT; Chin RK; Leung BF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Apr; 24(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 3582716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Relation between Head Circumference and Mid-Pelvic Circumference: A Simple Index for Cephalopelvic Disproportion Evaluation.
Liberty G; Gemer O; Siyanov I; Anteby EY; Apter A; Cohen SM; Bord I; Yagel S
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(11-12):840-848. PubMed ID: 34879366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia?
Spörri S; Thoeny HC; Raio L; Lachat R; Vock P; Schneider H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12076922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?
Huerta-Enochian GS; Katz VL; Fox LK; Hamlin JA; Kollath JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 16731086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].
Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 17188014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of fetal-pelvic index in the prediction of vaginal birth following previous cesarean section.
Wong KS; Wong AY; Tse LH; Tang LC
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Apr; 29(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 12755531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaginal breech delivery: a five-year prospective evaluation of a protocol using computed tomographic pelvimetry.
Christian SS; Brady K; Read JA; Kopelman JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):848-55. PubMed ID: 2403165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combination of ultrasound pelvimetry and fetal sonography in predicting cephalopelvic disproportion.
Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Dec; 110(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 9772407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Fetal-pelvic disproportion].
Juul SM; Clausen IH; Nielsen EK
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Nov; 155(48):3912-4. PubMed ID: 8273196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of cesarean delivery using the fetal-pelvic index.
Macones GA; Chang JJ; Stamilio DM; Odibo AO; Wang J; Cahill AG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):431.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23791690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An MRI-based pelvimetry nomogram for predicting surgical difficulty of transabdominal resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer.
Yuan Y; Tong D; Liu M; Lu H; Shen F; Shi X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():882300. PubMed ID: 35957878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion by ultrasonographic cephalopelic].
Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 33(9):533-5. PubMed ID: 10806728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An analysis of the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion.
Hanzal E; Kainz C; Hoffmann G; Deutinger J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1993; 253(4):161-6. PubMed ID: 8161249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
