These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36676636)

  • 1. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Long-Term Mortality Due to Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Ion AC; Serbanoiu LI; Plesu E; Busnatu SS; Andrei CL
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Dec; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: A single center 20-year experience.
    Garcia S; Kelly R; Mbai M; Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Yannopoulos D; Adabag S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):390-398. PubMed ID: 29316204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
    J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between surgical risk and 30-day stroke after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Matsuda Y; Nai Fovino L; Giacoppo D; Scotti A; Massussi M; Ueshima D; Sasano T; Fabris T; Tarantini G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E536-E543. PubMed ID: 32584507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Abbas AE; Ternacle J; Pibarot P; Xu K; Alu M; Rogers E; Hahn RT; Leon M; Thourani VH
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Aug; 14(8):e012364. PubMed ID: 34387097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The risk and extent of neurologic events are equivalent for high-risk patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Gleason TG; Schindler JT; Adams DH; Reardon MJ; Kleiman NS; Caplan LR; Conte JV; Deeb GM; Hughes GC; Chenoweth S; Popma JJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jul; 152(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 27085389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary revascularization during treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of the complete percutaneous approach (PCI plus TAVR) versus the complete surgical approach (CABG plus SAVR).
    Tarus A; Tinica G; Bacusca A; Artene B; Popa IV; Burlacu A
    J Card Surg; 2020 Aug; 35(8):2009-2016. PubMed ID: 32667080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.
    Burrage M; Moore P; Cole C; Cox S; Lo WC; Rafter A; Garlick B; Garrahy P; Mundy J; Camuglia A
    Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Mar; 26(3):285-295. PubMed ID: 27646577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propitious temporal changes in clinical outcomes after transcatheter compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; a meta-analysis of over 65,000 patients.
    Panchal A; Kyvernitakis A; Rayarao G; Doyle M; Biederman RWW
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2021 Oct; 16(1):312. PubMed ID: 34670586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.
    Thourani VH; Edelman JJ; Holmes SD; Nguyen TC; Carroll J; Mack MJ; Kapadia S; Tang GHL; Kodali S; Kaneko T; Meduri CU; Forcillo J; Ferdinand FD; Fontana G; Suwalski P; Kiaii B; Balkhy H; Kempfert J; Cheung A; Borger MA; Reardon M; Leon MB; Popma JJ; Ad N
    Innovations (Phila); 2021; 16(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 33491539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in people with low surgical risk.
    Kolkailah AA; Doukky R; Pelletier MP; Volgman AS; Kaneko T; Nabhan AF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 12(12):CD013319. PubMed ID: 31860123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.