These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36680411)
1. The accuracy of markerless motion capture combined with computer vision techniques for measuring running kinematics. Van Hooren B; Pecasse N; Meijer K; Essers JMN Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2023 Jun; 33(6):966-978. PubMed ID: 36680411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the accuracy of open-source pose estimation methods for measuring gait kinematics. Washabaugh EP; Shanmugam TA; Ranganathan R; Krishnan C Gait Posture; 2022 Sep; 97():188-195. PubMed ID: 35988434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted motion capture for medical applications: a comparative study between markerless and passive marker motion capture. Takeda I; Yamada A; Onodera H Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Jun; 24(8):864-873. PubMed ID: 33290107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics. Wade L; Needham L; McGuigan P; Bilzon J PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12995. PubMed ID: 35237469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pose2Sim: An End-to-End Workflow for 3D Markerless Sports Kinematics-Part 2: Accuracy. Pagnon D; Domalain M; Reveret L Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements. Song K; Hullfish TJ; Scattone Silva R; Silbernagel KG; Baxter JR J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111751. PubMed ID: 37552921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of validity of gait analysis systems during treadmill walking and running using human pose tracking algorithm. Ota M; Tateuchi H; Hashiguchi T; Ichihashi N Gait Posture; 2021 Mar; 85():290-297. PubMed ID: 33636458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions. Kanko RM; Outerleys JB; Laende EK; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ J Appl Biomech; 2024 Apr; 40(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 38237574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moving outside the lab: Markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump. Drazan JF; Phillips WT; Seethapathi N; Hullfish TJ; Baxter JR J Biomech; 2021 Aug; 125():110547. PubMed ID: 34175570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences between lower extremity joint running kinetics captured by marker-based and markerless systems were speed dependent. Tang H; Munkasy B; Li L J Sport Health Sci; 2024 Jul; 13(4):569-578. PubMed ID: 38218372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of several pose estimation methods for 3D joint centre localisation. Needham L; Evans M; Cosker DP; Wade L; McGuigan PM; Bilzon JL; Colyer SL Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20673. PubMed ID: 34667207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system. Harsted S; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Hestbæk L; Boyle E; Lauridsen HH Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():39. PubMed ID: 31417672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks. Turner JA; Chaaban CR; Padua DA J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 171():112200. PubMed ID: 38905926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement Between Sagittal Foot and Tibia Angles During Running Derived From an Open-Source Markerless Motion Capture Platform and Manual Digitization. Johnson CD; Outerleys J; Davis IS J Appl Biomech; 2022 Apr; 38(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 35272264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of 3D Markerless Motion Capture Accuracy Using OpenPose With Multiple Video Cameras. Nakano N; Sakura T; Ueda K; Omura L; Kimura A; Iino Y; Fukashiro S; Yoshioka S Front Sports Act Living; 2020; 2():50. PubMed ID: 33345042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements. Song K; Hullfish TJ; Silva RS; Silbernagel KG; Baxter JR bioRxiv; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of 3D Markerless Motion Capture System Accuracy during Skate Skiing on a Treadmill. Torvinen P; Ruotsalainen KS; Zhao S; Cronin N; Ohtonen O; Linnamo V Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criterion validity of neural networks to assess lower limb motion during cycling. Bini RR; Serrancoli G; Santiago PRP; Pinto A; Moura F J Sports Sci; 2023 Jan; 41(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 36975046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of three-dimensional kinematics between markerless and marker-based motion capture in overground gait. Ripic Z; Nienhuis M; Signorile JF; Best TM; Jacobs KA; Eltoukhy M J Biomech; 2023 Oct; 159():111793. PubMed ID: 37725886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D Tracking of Human Motion Using Visual Skeletonization and Stereoscopic Vision. Zago M; Luzzago M; Marangoni T; De Cecco M; Tarabini M; Galli M Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():181. PubMed ID: 32195243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]