These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36681017)

  • 1. On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions.
    Ebel P; Lingenfelder C; Vogelsang A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106956. PubMed ID: 36681017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chinese handwriting while driving: Effects of handwritten box size on in-vehicle information systems usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 36178277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic is optimal: Effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Zhi J; Guo G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 34937441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of mobile phone use engagement during naturalistic driving through explainable imbalanced machine learning.
    Ziakopoulos A; Kontaxi A; Yannis G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106936. PubMed ID: 36577243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models.
    Perrier MJR; Louw TL; Carsten OMJ
    Ergonomics; 2023 Aug; 66(8):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 36259259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the impact of driving automation systems on distracted driving behaviors.
    Dunn NJ; Dingus TA; Soccolich S; Horrey WJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106152. PubMed ID: 33932819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Young Novice Drivers' Cognitive Distraction Detection: Comparing Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Model of Vehicle Control Behavior.
    Xue Q; Wang X; Li Y; Guo W
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
    Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Gesture-Based Interaction on Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study Using the Projection-Based Vehicle-in-the-Loop.
    Graichen L; Graichen M; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 64(2):324-342. PubMed ID: 32795200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of off-path glances: A quantitative analysis of rear-end conflicts involving Chinese professional truck drivers as the striking partners.
    Pipkorn L; Bianchi Piccinini G
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():259-266. PubMed ID: 32199571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On-Road Evaluation of In-vehicle Interface Characteristics and Their Effects on Performance of Visual Detection on the Road and Manual Entry.
    Suh Y; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 30059239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.