162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36681107)
21. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Gauci MO; Seeto BL; Chalmers PN; Holzer N; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 28735842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem.
Lau SC; Keith PPA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 28927670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study.
Stübig T; Petri M; Zeckey C; Hawi N; Krettek C; Citak M; Meller R
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Dec; 9(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 23908109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis and 3D correction of glenoid dysplasia with metal hemi-wedge base plate augment: short-term radiographic outcomes.
Guehring T; Navas L; Westrich J; Zimmerer A; Schmidt S; Barrientos M; Ulmar B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Aug; 143(8):4763-4772. PubMed ID: 36705760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intraoperative navigation system use increases accuracy of glenoid component inclination but not functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study.
Gaj E; Pagnotta SM; Berlinberg EJ; Patel HH; Picconi O; Redler A; De Carli A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 37650896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Targeting repeatability of a less obtrusive surgical navigation procedure for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Aminov O; Regan W; Giles JW; Simon MJK; Hodgson AJ
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Feb; 17(2):283-293. PubMed ID: 34611779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study.
Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Sep; 28(9):1685-1691. PubMed ID: 31262637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Baba M; Deransart P; Boileau P; Mole D; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2897-2906. PubMed ID: 29968136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.
Iannotti J; Baker J; Rodriguez E; Brems J; Ricchetti E; Mesiha M; Bryan J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e71. PubMed ID: 24806017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation in shoulder arthroplasty.
Verborgt O; Vanhees M; Heylen S; Hardy P; Declercq G; Bicknell R
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev; 2014 Dec; 22(4):e42-9. PubMed ID: 25370882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors associated with functional improvement after posteriorly augmented total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gutman MJ; Kohan EM; Hendy BA; Joyce CD; Kirsch JM; Singh A; Sherman M; Austin LS; Namdari S; Williams GR
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6):1231-1241. PubMed ID: 36610476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Porous metal wedge augments to address glenoid retroversion in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: midterm update.
Sandow MJ; Tu CG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 32305149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on B2 vs. A1 type glenoids.
Sheth MM; Morris BJ; Laughlin MS; Cox JL; Jones S; Elkousy HA; Edwards TB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2571-2577. PubMed ID: 33190757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-Assisted Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Glenoid Implants in Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Levins JG; Kukreja M; Paxton ES; Green A
JBJS Rev; 2021 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 35417437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
