These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Recommendations for the design and analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies with measurement errors in the exposure variables. From the BGA Commission on Nutritional Epidemiology. Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S53-7. PubMed ID: 8262020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nutritional research within the Framingham Heart Study. Millen BE; Quatromoni PA J Nutr Health Aging; 2001; 5(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 11458282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability and validity of a food frequency checklist. Axelson JM; Csernus MM J Am Diet Assoc; 1983 Aug; 83(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 6875142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of a dietary score for assessing nutrient adequacy. Guthrie HA; Scheer JC J Am Diet Assoc; 1981 Mar; 78(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 7217578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Program of food technology of social interest]. Bourges-Rodríguez H Gac Med Mex; 1980 Apr; 116(4):152-8. PubMed ID: 7390096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A survey of the dietary nutritional composition of centenarians. Chen C Chin Med J (Engl); 2001 Oct; 114(10):1095-7. PubMed ID: 11677774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Nature and amount of data required for a definition of strategies and programs on food and nutrition. Lopes JM; Chacel JM Pag Bull; 1974 Dec; 4(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 12263439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Operationalization of food consumption surveys in Europe: recommendations from the European Food Consumption Survey Methods (EFCOSUM) Project. De Henauw S; Brants HA; Becker W; Kaic-Rak A; Ruprich J; Sekula W; Mensink GB; Koenig JS; Eur J Clin Nutr; 2002 May; 56 Suppl 2():S75-88. PubMed ID: 12082520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Food supply studies and consumption survey statistics on fat in United States diets. Rizek RL Cancer Res; 1981 Sep; 41(9 Pt 2):3729-30. PubMed ID: 7260933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Do food frequency questionnaires have too many limitations? Brown D J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1541-2. PubMed ID: 17000185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Controlled experiments in human nutrition: contemporary problems. Fidanza F Prev Med; 1983 Jan; 12(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 6844287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. US congress hears the good news on Chinese food. Anderson A Nature; 1988 Mar; 332(6160):100. PubMed ID: 3347249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Nutrient intakes of husbands and wives: implications for epidemiologic research. Lee J; Kolonel LN Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Apr; 115(4):515-25. PubMed ID: 7072701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing imperfect measures of exposure. Walker AM; Blettner M Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Jun; 121(6):783-90. PubMed ID: 4014171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. On the reliability of historical dietary information. de Vet HC; van Leeuwen FE Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Mar; 123(3):555-6. PubMed ID: 3946402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Methodologic issues for pooling dietary data. Friedenreich CM Am J Clin Nutr; 1994 Jan; 59(1 Suppl):251S-252S. PubMed ID: 8279435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]