156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36681959)
1. Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra in a multilevel posterior cervical fusion across the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical investigation.
Gelfand Y; Franco D; Kinon MD; De la Garza Ramos R; Yassari R; Harris JA; Flamand S; McGuckin JP; Gonzalez JL; Mahoney JM; Bucklen BS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Mar; 38(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 36681959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Analysis of Multilevel Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Constructs.
Murphy TP; Colantonio DF; Le AH; Fredericks DR; Schlaff CD; Holm EB; Sebastian AS; Pisano AJ; Helgeson MD; Wagner SC
Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Jun; 36(5):E212-E217. PubMed ID: 36823698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative Risks and Benefits of Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction During Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion: A Multicenter Cohort.
Okamoto N; Kato S; Doi T; Matsubayashi Y; Taniguchi Y; Yoshida Y; Kawamura N; Nakarai H; Higashikawa A; Tozawa K; Takeshita Y; Yu J; Hara N; Sasaki K; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():e265-e274. PubMed ID: 34175484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy.
Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage.
Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Selection in Posterior Cervical Fusion: Does Cervicothoracic Junction Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Predict Mechanical Failure?
Labrum JT; Khan I; Archer KR; Abtahi AM; Stephens BF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Apr; 46(8):E482-E490. PubMed ID: 33186274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do stand-alone interbody spacers with integrated screws provide adequate segmental stability for multilevel cervical arthrodesis?
Paik H; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Cardoso MJ; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1740-7. PubMed ID: 24462812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of pedicle and lateral mass screw construct stiffnesses at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
Rhee JM; Kraiwattanapong C; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(21):E636-40. PubMed ID: 16261101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation comparing zero-profile devices versus fixed profile systems in a cervical hybrid decompression model: a biomechanical in vitro study.
Kinon MD; Greeley SL; Harris JA; Gelfand Y; Yassari R; Nakhla J; De la Garza-Ramos R; Patel P; Mirabile B; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):657-664. PubMed ID: 31634616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of the lower thoracic spine after decompression and fusion: a cadaveric analysis.
Lubelski D; Healy AT; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2216-23. PubMed ID: 24662217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
