153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36681994)
1. Impact of γ factor in the penalty function of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) to achieve high-resolution PET images.
Miwa K; Yoshii T; Wagatsuma K; Nezu S; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Kobayashi R; Fukuda S; Yakushiji Y; Miyaji N; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jan; 10(1):4. PubMed ID: 36681994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function.
Yamaguchi S; Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Ishii K; Inoue K; Fukushi M
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Calatayud-Jordán J; Carrasco-Vela N; Chimeno-Hernández J; Carles-Fariña M; Olivas-Arroyo C; Bello-Arqués P; Pérez-Enguix D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Torres-Espallardo I
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the effect of a new Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (HYPER Iterative) on
Xu L; Cui C; Li R; Yang R; Liu R; Meng Q; Wang F
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Dec; 12(1):73. PubMed ID: 36504014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.
Tian D; Yang H; Li Y; Cui B; Lu J
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 35006411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner.
Caribé PRRV; Koole M; D'Asseler Y; Van Den Broeck B; Vandenberghe S
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 31823084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials.
Krokos G; Pike LC; Cook GJR; Marsden PK
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jul; 8(1):52. PubMed ID: 34273020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimising quantitative
Scott NP; McGowan DR
EJNMMI Res; 2019 May; 9(1):40. PubMed ID: 31076913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images.
Texte E; Gouel P; Thureau S; Lequesne J; Barres B; Edet-Sanson A; Decazes P; Vera P; Hapdey S
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 May; 7(1):28. PubMed ID: 32399752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of time-of-flight, resolution recovery, and noise modelling in reconstruction algorithms in non-solid-state detectors PET/CT scanners: - multi-centric comparison of activity recovery in a 68Ge phantom.
Chauvie S; Bergesio F; De Ponti E; Morzenti S; De Maggi A; Ragazzoni M; Chiesa C; Matheoud R
Phys Med; 2020 Jul; 75():85-91. PubMed ID: 32559650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
