298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36682728)
41. From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures.
Vrana NE; Gupta S; Mitra K; Rizvanov AA; Solovyeva VV; Antmen E; Salehi M; Ehterami A; Pourchet L; Barthes J; Marquette CA; von Unge M; Wang CY; Lai PL; Bit A
Cell Tissue Bank; 2022 Sep; 23(3):417-440. PubMed ID: 35000046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dipeptide Self-Assembled Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanical Properties and Degradability for 3D Bioprinting.
Jian H; Wang M; Dong Q; Li J; Wang A; Li X; Ren P; Bai S
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Dec; 11(50):46419-46426. PubMed ID: 31769283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hydrogels and Bioprinting in Bone Tissue Engineering: Creating Artificial Stem-Cell Niches for In Vitro Models.
Lewns FK; Tsigkou O; Cox LR; Wildman RD; Grover LM; Poologasundarampillai G
Adv Mater; 2023 Dec; 35(52):e2301670. PubMed ID: 37087739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Three-dimensional printing of extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking scaffolds: A critical review of the current ECM materials.
Da Silva K; Kumar P; Choonara YE; du Toit LC; Pillay V
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2020 Dec; 108(12):2324-2350. PubMed ID: 32363804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications.
Janarthanan G; Kim JH; Kim I; Lee C; Chung EJ; Noh I
Biofabrication; 2022 May; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. 3D printing with silk: considerations and applications.
DeBari MK; Keyser MN; Bai MA; Abbott RD
Connect Tissue Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30558445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. ECM concentration and cell-mediated traction forces play a role in vascular network assembly in 3D bioprinted tissue.
Zhang G; Varkey M; Wang Z; Xie B; Hou R; Atala A
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Apr; 117(4):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 31840798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Bisulfite-initiated crosslinking of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for embedded 3D bioprinting.
Bilici Ç; Tatar AG; Şentürk E; Dikyol C; Koç B
Biofabrication; 2022 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35062010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Employing PEG crosslinkers to optimize cell viability in gel phase bioinks and tailor post printing mechanical properties.
Rutz AL; Gargus ES; Hyland KE; Lewis PL; Setty A; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Acta Biomater; 2019 Nov; 99():121-132. PubMed ID: 31539655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.
Marques CF; Diogo GS; Pina S; Oliveira JM; Silva TH; Reis RL
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Mar; 30(3):32. PubMed ID: 30840132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Microgel-Extracellular Matrix Composite Support for the Embedded 3D Printing of Human Neural Constructs.
Kajtez J; Radeke C; Lind JU; Emnéus J
J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37212554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Optimization of collagen type I-hyaluronan hybrid bioink for 3D bioprinted liver microenvironments.
Mazzocchi A; Devarasetty M; Huntwork R; Soker S; Skardal A
Biofabrication; 2018 Oct; 11(1):015003. PubMed ID: 30270846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Exploiting the role of nanoparticles for use in hydrogel-based bioprinting applications: concept, design, and recent advances.
Chakraborty A; Roy A; Ravi SP; Paul A
Biomater Sci; 2021 Sep; 9(19):6337-6354. PubMed ID: 34397056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Advanced Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Tissue and Organ Analogs Using Alginate Hydrogel Bioinks.
Gao Q; Kim BS; Gao G
Mar Drugs; 2021 Dec; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 34940707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Bioprinting of 3D Tissue Models Using Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink.
Pati F; Cho DW
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1612():381-390. PubMed ID: 28634957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Advances in tissue engineering of vasculature through three-dimensional bioprinting.
Zhu J; Wang Y; Zhong L; Pan F; Wang J
Dev Dyn; 2021 Dec; 250(12):1717-1738. PubMed ID: 34115420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks.
Adhikari J; Roy A; Das A; Ghosh M; Thomas S; Sinha A; Kim J; Saha P
Macromol Biosci; 2021 Jan; 21(1):e2000179. PubMed ID: 33017096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Development of photo-crosslinkable platelet lysate-based hydrogels for 3D printing and tissue engineering.
Min SJ; Lee JS; Nah H; Kim SH; Moon HJ; Reis RL; Kwon IK; Heo DN
Biofabrication; 2021 Aug; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34330124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Chitosan hydrogels in 3D printing for biomedical applications.
Rajabi M; McConnell M; Cabral J; Ali MA
Carbohydr Polym; 2021 May; 260():117768. PubMed ID: 33712126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Bioprintable tough hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.
Dorishetty P; Dutta NK; Choudhury NR
Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2020 Jul; 281():102163. PubMed ID: 32388202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
