These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Potential Effects of Hall TS Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On Interpretation and Appreciation. A European Human Rights Perspective on Buijsen M Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):323-336. PubMed ID: 36688281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights. Clark CS; Paluck EL; Westwood SJ; Sen M; Malhotra N; Jessee S Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Jan; 8(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 37945806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond. Martin PA Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)? Räsänen J; Gothreau C; Lippert-Rasmussen K J Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 48(12):952-956. PubMed ID: 36180204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health. Harrison LK; Naylor KL Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting Health after Dobbs. Clark BR Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judicial bypass for minors post- Horvath S; Frietsche S Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231219601. PubMed ID: 38146197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond Abortion: The Consequences of Overturning Paltrow LM; Harris LH; Marshall MF Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):3-15. PubMed ID: 35652910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The End of Ziegler M Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter? Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision. Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care. Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]