These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36685791)

  • 1. Three-dimensional analysis of the outcome of different scanning strategies in virtual interocclusal registration.
    Mei J; Ma L; Chao J; Liu F; Shen J
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 36685791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy comparison of bilateral versus complete arch interocclusal registration scans for virtual articulation.
    Lee JD; Luu D; Yoon TW; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36813588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of virtual interocclusal records for partially edentulous patients.
    Ren S; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):860-865. PubMed ID: 31672422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of accuracy in digital and conventional cross-mounting.
    Luu D; Kan E; Kim SW; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 36473749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Accuracy of Transferring Casts in Maximal Intercuspal Position to a Virtual Articulator.
    He M; Ding Q; Li L; Yang G; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhang L
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 34196456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical application of a prefabricated interocclusal recording cap for making interocclusal records of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Ding Q; Pu TT; He MZ; Wang SM; Li WJ; Zhang L; Liu JZ; Tong D; Zhou YS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 56(12):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 34915654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems.
    Wong KY; Esguerra RJ; Chia VAP; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29160904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction with the dental articulator position method].
    Li LL; Zhao YJ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 32071477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models-Part II: Effect of Model Scanner-CAD Systems and Articulation Method.
    Yee SHX; Esguerra RJ; Chew AAQ; Wong KM; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):137-144. PubMed ID: 29210502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.
    Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Virtual Static Articulation: A Systematic Review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqah N
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(5):627–646. PubMed ID: 35349610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.