These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36687811)

  • 1. Communication and deniability: Moral and epistemic reactions to denials.
    Bonalumi F; Bumin FB; Scott-Phillips T; Heintz C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1073213. PubMed ID: 36687811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shared reality in intergroup communication: Increasing the epistemic authority of an out-group audience.
    Echterhoff G; Kopietz R; Higgins ET
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jun; 146(6):806-825. PubMed ID: 28368197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pragmatics in understanding what is said.
    Gibbs RW; Moise JF
    Cognition; 1997 Jan; 62(1):51-74. PubMed ID: 8997170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Group Perception Affects What People Share and How People Feel: The Role of Entitativity and Epistemic Trust in the "Saying-Is-Believing" Effect.
    Liang T; Lin Z; Souma T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():728864. PubMed ID: 34630240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluctuating confidence: the dynamic consequences of true/false affirmatives and denials on how a listener appraises their personal past.
    Davis J; Bayantemur SY; Seecharan S; Unger LD; Hellgren J; Stone CB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):882-893. PubMed ID: 29692201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
    Schuster S; Degen J
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning words from speakers with false beliefs.
    Papafragou A; Fairchild S; Cohen ML; Friedberg C
    J Child Lang; 2017 Jul; 44(4):905-923. PubMed ID: 27323650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Goal inference in moral narratives.
    Kim JS; Colombatto C; Crockett MJ
    Cognition; 2024 Oct; 251():105865. PubMed ID: 39126974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biased memory retrieval in the service of shared reality with an audience: The role of cognitive accessibility.
    Wagner U; Higgins ET; Axmacher N; Echterhoff G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1605-1627. PubMed ID: 38661635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences.
    Kampa A; Papafragou A
    Dev Sci; 2020 May; 23(3):e12920. PubMed ID: 31693776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
    Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: a response to Gibbs and Moise.
    Nicolle S; Clark B
    Cognition; 1999 Jan; 69(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 10193051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence.
    Mauchand M; Caballero JA; Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 21(1):74-92. PubMed ID: 33420711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rationales for indirect speech: the theory of the strategic speaker.
    Lee JJ; Pinker S
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):785-807. PubMed ID: 20658853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Speaker's Gaze and Syntax in Verb Learning.
    Nappa R; Wessel A; McEldoon KL; Gleitman LR; Trueswell JC
    Lang Learn Dev; 2009; 5(4):203-234. PubMed ID: 24465183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of false denials on forgetting and false memory.
    Otgaar H; Howe ML; Mangiulli I; Bücken C
    Cognition; 2020 Sep; 202():104322. PubMed ID: 32470711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?
    Lane LW; Ferreira VS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1466-81. PubMed ID: 18980408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory.
    Echterhoff G; Higgins ET; Kopietz R; Groll S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 18248126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of speaker sincerity in complex social interactions by cochlear implant users.
    Rothermich K; Dixon S; Weiner M; Capps M; Dong L; Paquette S; Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269652. PubMed ID: 35675356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.