These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36687888)

  • 21. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs.
    Patson ND; Ferreira F
    J Mem Lang; 2009 May; 60(4):464-486. PubMed ID: 20161247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers' Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading.
    Tan M; Foltz A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():575847. PubMed ID: 33041947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hopf JM; Bader M; Meng M; Bayer J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 15(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 12429368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How Do French-English Bilinguals Pull Verb Particle Constructions Off? Factors Influencing Second Language Processing of Unfamiliar Structures at the Syntax-Semantics Interface.
    Herbay AC; Gonnerman LM; Baum SR
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1885. PubMed ID: 30405466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The role of animacy in European Portuguese relative clause attachment: evidence from production and comprehension tasks].
    Soares AP; Fraga I; Comesaña M; Piñeiro A
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):691-6. PubMed ID: 21044499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lexical mediation and context effects in sentence processing.
    Traxler MJ; Tooley KM
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():59-74. PubMed ID: 17112486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Rational Model of Incremental Argument Interpretation: The Comprehension of Swedish Transitive Clauses.
    Hörberg T; Jaeger TF
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():674202. PubMed ID: 34721134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phrase length matters: the interplay between implicit prosody and syntax in Korean "garden path" sentences.
    Hwang H; Steinhauer K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3555-75. PubMed ID: 21391765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Representation of the verb's argument-structure in the human brain.
    Assadollahi R; Rockstroh BS
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 9():69. PubMed ID: 18644141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The time course of argument reactivation revealed: using the visual world paradigm.
    Koring L; Mak P; Reuland E
    Cognition; 2012 Jun; 123(3):361-79. PubMed ID: 22475295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Rogalski Y; Bodner T; Weichselbaum A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Sep; 57(5):990-1005. PubMed ID: 35611868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.
    Bousquet K; Swaab TY; Long DL
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2020; 35(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 32953924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting complex syntactic structure in real time: Processing of negative sentences in Russian.
    Kazanina N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2200-2218. PubMed ID: 27557566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Priming prepositional phrase attachment: evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials.
    Boudewyn MA; Zirnstein M; Swaab TY; Traxler MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):424-54. PubMed ID: 23859219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.
    Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Weber-Fox C
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 18945484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.
    Hopf JM; Bayer J; Bader M; Meng M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Mar; 10(2):264-80. PubMed ID: 9555111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.
    Chromý J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 34289762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Frazier L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18426063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.