222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36689007)
1. The influence of receptor expression and clinical subtypes on baseline [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Mooij CM; Ploumen RAW; Nelemans PJ; Mottaghy FM; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
EJNMMI Res; 2023 Jan; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 36689007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined
Wu J; Zhang X; Jia Z; Zhou X; Qi R; Ji H; Sun J; Sun C; Teng Z; Lu G; Chen X
Mol Pharm; 2022 Sep; 19(9):3405-3411. PubMed ID: 35972444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer correlates with immunohistochemically defined subtypes.
Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Cho N; Chang JM; Bae MS; Kim WH; Lee SH; Kim MY; Kim JY; Seo M; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):610-8. PubMed ID: 24097303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumour 18 F-FDG Uptake on preoperative PET/CT may predict axillary lymph node metastasis in ER-positive/HER2-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subtypes.
Kim JY; Lee SH; Kim S; Kang T; Bae YT
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1172-81. PubMed ID: 25298170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the value of 18F-FDG uptake, described by SUVmax, SUVavg, metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis, to clinicopathological prognostic factors and biological subtypes in breast cancer.
Kajáry K; Tőkés T; Dank M; Kulka J; Szakáll S; Lengyel Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jan; 36(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 25299471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of Clinical Molecular Typing of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using
Zhang J; Liu Y; Fan H; Wang W; Shao W; Cao G; Shi X
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S82-S92. PubMed ID: 36624021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Clinicopathological Analysis of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer using Immunohistochemical Surrogates: A 6-Year Institutional Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Center in North India.
Somal PK; Sancheti S; Sharma A; Sali AP; Chaudhary D; Goel A; Dora TK; Brar R; Gulia A; Divatia J
South Asian J Cancer; 2023 Apr; 12(2):104-111. PubMed ID: 37969672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between semiquantitative PET parameters and molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Chiacchio S; Evangelista L; Alsharif A; Manca G; DI Martino F; Negri A; Tredici M; Cervino AR; Puccini G; Filidei E; Ghilli M; Naccarato AG; Roncella M; Volterrani D
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 26329496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-Term Outcomes of Immunohistochemically Defined Subtypes of Breast Cancer Less Than or Equal to 2 cm After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Pata G; Guaineri A; Bianchi A; Amoroso V; Pasinetti N; Pasini M
J Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 236():288-299. PubMed ID: 30694768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics and outcomes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer as classified by a panel of four biomarkers using immunohistochemistry.
Park S; Koo JS; Kim MS; Park HS; Lee JS; Lee JS; Kim SI; Park BW
Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21865043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.
Koo HR; Park JS; Kang KW; Han W; Park IA; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3314-21. PubMed ID: 25903708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Journal Club: Diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in predicting the clinicopathologic subtypes of invasive breast cancer.
Miyake KK; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Sugie T; Mikami Y; Toi M; Togashi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):272-9. PubMed ID: 25055259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Khare S; Singh SS; Irrinki S; Sakaray Y; Mittal BR; Bal A; Singh G
Indian J Nucl Med; 2018; 33(4):290-294. PubMed ID: 30386049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters.
Ege Aktas G; Taştekin E; Sarikaya A
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 29135722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FDG PET/CT during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict response in ER-positive/HER2-negative and triple negative, but not in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Koolen BB; Pengel KE; Wesseling J; Vogel WV; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Vincent AD; Gilhuijs KG; Rodenhuis S; Rutgers EJ; Valdés Olmos RA
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 23414930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Wong K; Sheehan-Dare G; Nguyen A; Ho B; Liu V; Lee J; Brown L; Dear R; Chan L; Sharma S; Malaroda A; Smith I; Lim E; Emmett L
Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 35890071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer molecular subtypes and receptor status among women at Potchefstroom Hospital: a cross-sectional study.
Kakudji BK; Mwila PK; Burger JR; du Plessis JM; Naidu K
Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 38():85. PubMed ID: 33889251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
