These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36689341)

  • 1. How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?
    Murphy G; Maher J; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Dawson CA; Huston C; Ryan KM; Greene CM
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):474-481. PubMed ID: 36689341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study.
    Greene CM; Ryan KM; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Dawson CA; Huston C; Maher J; Murphy G
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jul; 52(5):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 38286945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
    Murphy G; Loftus E; Grady RH; Levine LJ; Greene CM
    Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):938-949. PubMed ID: 32762497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lost in the mall again: a preregistered replication and extension of Loftus & Pickrell (1995).
    Murphy G; Dawson CA; Huston C; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Fitzsimons C; Maher J; Ryan KM; Greene CM
    Memory; 2023 Jun; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 37312574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lost in the mall again: a preregistered replication and extension of Loftus & Pickrell (1995).
    Murphy G; Dawson CA; Huston C; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Fitzsimons C; Maher J; Ryan KM; Greene CM
    Memory; 2023 Jul; 31(6):818-830. PubMed ID: 37017540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing recollective experience in true and false autobiographical memories.
    Heaps CM; Nash M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jul; 27(4):920-30. PubMed ID: 11486925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Lost in a shopping mall" -- a breach of professional ethics.
    Crook LS; Dean MC
    Ethics Behav; 1999; 9(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 11657487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural correlates of true memory, false memory, and deception.
    Abe N; Okuda J; Suzuki M; Sasaki H; Matsuda T; Mori E; Tsukada M; Fujii T
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2811-9. PubMed ID: 18372290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency of concealment, fabrication and falsification of study data by deceptive subjects.
    Devine EG; Pingitore AM; Margiotta KN; Hadaway NA; Reid K; Peebles K; Hyun JW
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2021 Mar; 21():100713. PubMed ID: 33604482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How deception and believability feedback affect recall.
    Vo TVA; Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):706-714. PubMed ID: 33557706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hope and deception.
    Ruddick W
    Bioethics; 1999 Jul; 13(3-4):343-57. PubMed ID: 11657244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ubiquity of deception and the ethics of deceptive research.
    Benham B
    Bioethics; 2008 Mar; 22(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 18257801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The origin of children's implanted false memories: memory traces or compliance?
    Otgaar H; Verschuere B; Meijer EH; van Oorsouw K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 22321452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reaction time of motor responses in two-stimulus paradigms involving deception and congruity with varying levels of difficulty.
    Vendemia JM; Buzan RF; Simon-Dack SL
    Behav Neurol; 2005; 16(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 16082077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can fMRI discriminate between deception and false memory? A meta-analytic comparison between deception and false memory studies.
    Yu J; Tao Q; Zhang R; Chan CCH; Lee TMC
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Sep; 104():43-55. PubMed ID: 31251965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting Deception in Our Research Participants: Are Your Participants Who You Think They Are?
    McCaul ME; Wand GS
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2018 Feb; 42(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 29286543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable?
    Wendler D
    Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.
    Sai L; Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():149-156. PubMed ID: 29990705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the acceptability of individual studies that use deception: A systematic review of normative guidance documents.
    Verbeke K; Krawczyk T; Baeyens D; Piasecki J; Borry P
    Account Res; 2024 Aug; 31(6):655-677. PubMed ID: 36448698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.