These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36691678)

  • 1. An Effect of Gaze Direction in Cocktail Party Listening.
    Best V; Boyd AD; Sen K
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231152356. PubMed ID: 36691678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and Directional Cue Effects on the Cocktail Party Problem for Patients With Listening Difficulties Without Clinical Hearing Loss.
    Kawase T; Teraoka R; Obuchi C; Sakamoto S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 35671083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.
    Vander Ghinst M; Bourguignon M; Op de Beeck M; Wens V; Marty B; Hassid S; Choufani G; Jousmäki V; Hari R; Van Bogaert P; Goldman S; De Tiège X
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(5):1596-606. PubMed ID: 26843641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where is the cocktail party? Decoding locations of attended and unattended moving sound sources using EEG.
    Bednar A; Lalor EC
    Neuroimage; 2020 Jan; 205():116283. PubMed ID: 31629828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 17515218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Sound Localization on Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Speech Recognition in a Simulated Multitalker Environment.
    Sheffield SW; Wheeler HJ; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231186040. PubMed ID: 37415497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audio and visual cues in a two-talker divided attention speech-monitoring task.
    Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):562-73. PubMed ID: 16435697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.
    Cho AY; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1684. PubMed ID: 36182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening.
    Lewald J; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():157-66. PubMed ID: 26092714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of gaze eccentricity on perceived sound direction and its relation to visual localization.
    Lewald J
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):206-16. PubMed ID: 9472749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech Intelligibility in Reverberation is Reduced During Self-Rotation.
    Hládek Ľ; Seeber BU
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231188619. PubMed ID: 37475460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Sound-Localization Behavior With Multiple Concurrent Sources.
    Bernstein JGW; Phatak SA; Schuchman GI; Stakhovskaya OA; Rivera AL; Brungart DS
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):206-219. PubMed ID: 34320529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements.
    Coudert A; Gaveau V; Gatel J; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Farne A; Pavani F; Truy E
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):192-205. PubMed ID: 34225320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the Performance of a Visually Guided Hearing Aid Using a Dynamic Auditory-Visual Word Congruence Task.
    Roverud E; Best V; Mason CR; Streeter T; Kidd G
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):756-769. PubMed ID: 29252977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain correlates of the orientation of auditory spatial attention onto speaker location in a "cocktail-party" situation.
    Lewald J; Hanenberg C; Getzmann S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1484-95. PubMed ID: 27333881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
    Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.