These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36691691)

  • 1. Public Policy Experiments without Equipoise: When Is Randomization Fair?
    MacKay D; Cohn E
    Ethics Hum Res; 2023 Jan; 45(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 36691691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ethics of public policy RCTs: The principle of policy equipoise.
    MacKay D
    Bioethics; 2018 Jan; 32(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 29023957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethics of Adaptive Designs for Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Chongwe G; Ali J; Kaye DK; Michelo C; Kass NE
    Ethics Hum Res; 2023; 45(5):2-14. PubMed ID: 37777976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.
    Hargreaves JR; Copas AJ; Beard E; Osrin D; Lewis JJ; Davey C; Thompson JA; Baio G; Fielding KL; Prost A
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():350. PubMed ID: 26279013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logistic, ethical, and political dimensions of stepped wedge trials: critical review and case studies.
    Prost A; Binik A; Abubakar I; Roy A; De Allegri M; Mouchoux C; Dreischulte T; Ayles H; Lewis JJ; Osrin D
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():351. PubMed ID: 26278521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delaying and withholding interventions: ethics and the stepped wedge trial.
    Binik A
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Oct; 45(10):662-667. PubMed ID: 31341013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome-adaptive randomization in clinical trials: issues of participant welfare and autonomy.
    Sim J
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2019 Apr; 40(2):83-101. PubMed ID: 30778720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice.
    Ashcroft R
    Bioethics; 1999 Jul; 13(3-4):314-26. PubMed ID: 11657242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-randomized and randomized stepped-wedge designs using an orthogonalized least squares framework.
    Hu Y; Hoover DR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1202-1218. PubMed ID: 27405326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Random treatment assignment using mathematical equipoise for comparative effectiveness trials.
    Selker HP; Ruthazer R; Terrin N; Griffith JL; Concannon T; Kent DM
    Clin Transl Sci; 2011 Feb; 4(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21348950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Oregon health insurance experiment: when limited policy resources provide research opportunities.
    Allen H; Baicker K; Taubman S; Wright B; Finkelstein A
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2013 Dec; 38(6):1183-92. PubMed ID: 23974473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical issues in the design and conduct of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials in low-resource settings.
    Joag K; Ambrosio G; Kestler E; Weijer C; Hemming K; Van der Graaf R
    Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 2):703. PubMed ID: 31852547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to Fairly Allocate Scarce Medical Resources: Ethical Argumentation under Scrutiny by Health Professionals and Lay People.
    Krütli P; Rosemann T; Törnblom KY; Smieszek T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159086. PubMed ID: 27462880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deciphering assumptions about stepped wedge designs: the case of Ebola vaccine research.
    Doussau A; Grady C
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Dec; 42(12):797-804. PubMed ID: 27754861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a covariate-constrained randomization procedure in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chaussee EL; Dickinson LM; Fairclough DL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106409. PubMed ID: 33894362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CRTpowerdist: An R package to calculate attained power and construct the power distribution for cross-sectional stepped-wedge and parallel cluster randomized trials.
    Ouyang Y; Xu L; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Wong H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106255. PubMed ID: 34260969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different methods to analyze stepped wedge trial designs revealed different aspects of intervention effects.
    Twisk JW; Hoogendijk EO; Zwijsen SA; de Boer MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():75-83. PubMed ID: 26586107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.