152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36692714)
1. Machine learning for better prediction of seepage flow through embankment dams: Gaussian process regression versus SVR and RVM.
Bouchehed A; Laouacheria F; Heddam S; Djemili L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(9):24751-24763. PubMed ID: 36692714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intelligent optimization for modelling superhydrophobic ceramic membrane oil flux and oil-water separation efficiency: Evidence from wastewater treatment and experimental laboratory.
Usman J; Salami BA; Gbadamosi A; Adamu H; Usman AG; Benaafi M; Abba SI; Dzarfan Othman MH; Aljundi IH
Chemosphere; 2023 Aug; 331():138726. PubMed ID: 37116721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting biochemical oxygen demand in wastewater treatment plant using advance extreme learning machine optimized by Bat algorithm.
Mekaoussi H; Heddam S; Bouslimanni N; Kim S; Zounemat-Kermani M
Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e21351. PubMed ID: 37954260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Least square support vector machine-based variational mode decomposition: a new hybrid model for daily river water temperature modeling.
Heddam S; Ptak M; Sojka M; Kim S; Malik A; Kisi O; Zounemat-Kermani M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(47):71555-71582. PubMed ID: 35604598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of evaporation from dam reservoirs under climate change using soft computing techniques.
Kayhomayoon Z; Naghizadeh F; Malekpoor M; Arya Azar N; Ball J; Ghordoyee Milan S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27912-27935. PubMed ID: 36385346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of meteorological drought by using hybrid support vector regression optimized with HHO versus PSO algorithms.
Malik A; Tikhamarine Y; Sammen SS; Abba SI; Shahid S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(29):39139-39158. PubMed ID: 33751346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LT-FS-ID: Log-Transformed Feature Learning and Feature-Scaling-Based Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the
Singh A; Amutha J; Nagar J; Sharma S; Lee CC
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive modelling of piezometric head and seepage discharge in earth dam using soft computational models.
Parsaie A; Haghiabi AH; Latif SD; Tripathi RP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(43):60842-60856. PubMed ID: 34165757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing.
Javadi F; Qaderi K; Ahmadi MM; Rahimpour M; Madadi MR; Mahdavi-Meymand A
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19390. PubMed ID: 36371476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of prediction and classification performances in different machine learning models for patient-specific quality assurance of head-and-neck VMAT plans.
Kusunoki T; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Kusano Y; Yoshida D; Katoh H; Shimbo M; Takahashi T
Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):727-741. PubMed ID: 34859445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regression analysis for detecting epileptic seizure with different feature extracting strategies.
Hussain L; Saeed S; Idris A; Awan IA; Shah SA; Majid A; Ahmed B; Chaudhary QA
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Dec; 64(6):619-642. PubMed ID: 31145684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling coagulant dosage in drinking water treatment plant using advance machine learning model: Hybrid extreme learning machine optimized by Bat algorithm.
Boumezbeur H; Laouacheria F; Heddam S; Djemili L
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(28):72463-72483. PubMed ID: 37171728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forecasting of stage-discharge in a non-perennial river using machine learning with gamma test.
Vishwakarma DK; Kuriqi A; Abed SA; Kishore G; Al-Ansari N; Pandey K; Kumar P; Kushwaha NL; Jewel A
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16290. PubMed ID: 37251828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposed formulation of surface water quality and modelling using gene expression, machine learning, and regression techniques.
Shah MI; Javed MF; Abunama T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13202-13220. PubMed ID: 33179185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans.
Salari E; Shuai Xu K; Sperling NN; Parsai EI
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13824. PubMed ID: 36495010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of
Tarlak F; Yücel Ö
Life (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37511805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extreme learning machines: a new approach for modeling dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration with and without water quality variables as predictors.
Heddam S; Kisi O
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jul; 24(20):16702-16724. PubMed ID: 28560629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the incubated river water quality indicator based on machine learning and deep learning paradigms: BOD5 Prediction.
Kim S; Alizamir M; Seo Y; Heddam S; Chung IM; Kim YO; Kisi O; Singh VP
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(12):12744-12773. PubMed ID: 36654020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy.
Grewal HS; Chacko MS; Ahmad S; Jin H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 21(7):128-134. PubMed ID: 32419245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
