These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36693586)

  • 21. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
    Cameron AB; Evans JL; Abuzar MA; Tadakamadla SK; Love RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trueness of artificial teeth for CAD-CAM complete dentures fabricated with additive manufacturing implementing different denture base-tooth offset values: An in vitro study.
    Neena AF; Abd-Ellah ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):705.e1-705.e7. PubMed ID: 38262840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3D printing.
    Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Bhering CLB; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jul; 122(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 30922558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
    Wemken G; Spies BC; Pieralli S; Adali U; Beuer F; Wesemann C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
    Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ACCURACY OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE METAL FRAMEWORKS FABRICATED BY COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/ COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Mai HY; Mai HN; Kim HJ; Lee J; Lee DH
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 22(3):101681. PubMed ID: 36162896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fit of monolithic multilayer zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated by conventional versus digital impression: a clinical and laboratory investigations.
    Morsy N; El Kateb M; Azer A; Fathalla S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5363-5373. PubMed ID: 33619632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
    Gao H; Yang Z; Lin WS; Tan J; Chen L
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks.
    Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intaglio surface trueness of dentures bases fabricated with 3D printing vs. conventional workflow: a clinical study.
    Faur AB; Rotar RN; Jivănescu A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):671. PubMed ID: 38851680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trueness and precision of milled and 3D printed root-analogue implants: A comparative in vitro study.
    Aldesoki M; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Evers-Dietze B; Elshazly TM; Bourauel C
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104425. PubMed ID: 36646269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer.
    Revilla-León M; Fry E; Supaphakorn A; Barmak AB; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37246096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of intraoral scanner and finish line location on the fabrication trueness and margin quality of additively manufactured laminate veneers fabricated with a completely digital workflow.
    Çakmak G; Chebaro J; Donmez MB; Yılmaz D; Yoon HI; Kahveci Ç; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):313.e1-313.e9. PubMed ID: 37978007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.