BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36695627)

  • 1. Zirconia restorations and the tool diameter compensation.
    Yazigi C; Busch R; Kern M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 36695627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types?
    de Almeida IG; Antunes DB; Braun NX; Restani A; Straioto FG; Galhano GA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):127-129. PubMed ID: 30900671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
    Del Piñal M; Lopez-Suarez C; Bartolome JF; Volpato CA; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of CAD/CAM Fabrication and Sintering Procedures on the Fracture Load of Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as a Function of Material Thickness.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):219-226. PubMed ID: 31738694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
    Yildirim B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of thin-walled monolithic zirconia and polymer-containing CAD-CAM crowns.
    Schlenz MA; Fiege C; Schmidt A; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):316-322. PubMed ID: 32151385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of CAD-CAM tool deterioration on the trueness of ceramic restorations.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan RB; Al Rashdan BA; Al Quran FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 33342613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
    Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different CAD/CAM cutting depths on the post-fatigue load-bearing capacity of novel multilayer zirconia restorations.
    Li X; Wang Q; Qiu X; Zhao B
    J Dent; 2021 Aug; 111():103709. PubMed ID: 34062215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.