178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36696046)
1. Diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tadesse GF; Tegaw EM; Abdisa EK
J Ultrasound; 2023 Jun; 26(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36696046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical usefulness of breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality to mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Sun Y; Wei W; Yang HW; Liu JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Feb; 40(3):450-63. PubMed ID: 23151912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in combination with mammography for breast cancer within 2 cm: a meta-analysis].
Lin H; Lin H; Liang H
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1699-703. PubMed ID: 24273283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: ultrasonographic, mammographic and histopathologic correlations.
Jin ZQ; Lin MY; Hao WQ; Jiang HT; Zhang L; Hu WH; Zhang M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 25479813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yuan WH; Hsu HC; Chen YY; Wu CH
Br J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 123(4):673-688. PubMed ID: 32528118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.
Osako T; Takahashi K; Iwase T; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 17485910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.
Osako T; Iwase T; Takahashi K; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 17690501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer.
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):461-74. PubMed ID: 18193352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge.
Barsic Ostojic S; Grbanovic L; Tonklin A; Kovacevic L; Marusic Z; Prutki M
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Oct; 5(10):e1602. PubMed ID: 35142103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between ultrasonography and mammography, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for the detection of breast cancers.
Tohnosu N; Okuyama K; Koide Y; Kikuchi T; Awano T; Matsubara H; Sano T; Nakaichi H; Funami Y; Matsushita K
Surg Today; 1993; 23(8):704-10. PubMed ID: 8400674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu J; Lei J; Ou Y; Zhao Y; Tuo X; Zhang B; Shen M
Clin Exp Med; 2023 Oct; 23(6):2341-2356. PubMed ID: 36242643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions.
Pereira RO; Luz LAD; Chagas DC; Amorim JR; Nery-Júnior EJ; Alves ACBR; Abreu-Neto FT; Oliveira MDCB; Silva DRC; Soares-Júnior JM; Silva BBD
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2020; 75():e1805. PubMed ID: 32725074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Xiang W; Rao H; Zhou L
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 32233072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
Cozzi A; Magni V; Zanardo M; Schiaffino S; Sardanelli F
Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):568-581. PubMed ID: 34904875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ultrasound and mammography for early diagnosis of breast cancer among Chinese women with suspected breast lesions: A prospective trial.
Wang Y; Li Y; Song Y; Chen C; Wang Z; Li L; Liu M; Liu G; Xu Y; Zhou Y; Sun Q; Shen S
Thorac Cancer; 2022 Nov; 13(22):3145-3151. PubMed ID: 36177910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging.
Satake H; Shimamoto K; Sawaki A; Niimi R; Ando Y; Ishiguchi T; Ishigaki T; Yamakawa K; Nagasaka T; Funahashi H
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(11):1726-32. PubMed ID: 11097398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review.
Flobbe K; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Beets GL; von Meyenfeldt MF; van Engelshoven JM
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(8):1044-50. PubMed ID: 12008191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
