142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36696331)
41. Relative Value Units Underestimate Reimbursement for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Belay ES; Charalambous LT; Saltzman EB; Klifto CS; Anakwenze O
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 May; 30(9):416-420. PubMed ID: 35171845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Correlation of Relative Value Units With Surgical Complexity and Physician Workload: A Contemporary Nationwide Analysis of Orthopaedic Procedures.
McNassor R; Grits D; Said TM; Burkhart RJ; Acuña AJ; Kamath AF
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 31(8):413-420. PubMed ID: 36749881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Work relative value units do not account for complexity and operative time in hypospadias surgery.
Jiang DD; Gillis KA; Chakiryan NH; Acevedo AM; Austin JC; Seideman CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Aug; 16(4):459.e1-459.e5. PubMed ID: 32451244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effect of 2 Teams and Operative Time on Complications After Oral Cavity Free Flap Reconstruction.
Shaikh N; Noor K; Jafary H; Chung J; Fancy T; Stokes W
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Nov; 132(11):1430-1437. PubMed ID: 37012707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors associated with RVU generation in common sports medicine procedures.
Kreulen RT; Raad M; Musharbash FN; Nayar SK; Best MJ; Puvanesarajah V; Marrache M; Srikumaran U; Wilckens JH
Phys Sportsmed; 2022 Jun; 50(3):233-238. PubMed ID: 33751911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Free Flap Versus Pedicled Flap Reconstruction of Laryngopharyngeal Defects: A 10-Year National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.
Haidar YM; Kuan EC; Verma SP; Goddard JA; Armstrong WB; Tjoa T
Laryngoscope; 2019 Jan; 129(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30151829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Are Orthopedic Hand Surgeons Undercompensated for Time Spent in the Operating Room? A Study of Relative Value Units.
Simcox T; Safi S; Becker J; Kreinces J; Wilson A
Hand (N Y); 2023 Jul; 18(5):861-867. PubMed ID: 34991363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Relative Value Unit Compensation Rates for Hospital-Based Shoulder/Elbow Surgery Versus Hand Surgery.
Nayar SK; Aziz KT; Best MJ; Giladi AM; LaPorte DM; Srikumaran U; Ingari JV
Orthopedics; 2021; 44(3):e373-e377. PubMed ID: 33238011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Underrepresentation of pediatric operations in the relative value unit updating process.
Massoumi RL; Childers CP; Lee SL
J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Jun; 56(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 33743987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Primary versus revision total shoulder arthroplasty: comparing relative value and reimbursement trends.
Carney JJ; Gerlach E; Plantz M; Swiatek PR; Marx J; Saltzman M; Marra G
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2022 Mar; 25(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 35045596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve?
Goff BA; Muntz HG; Cain JM
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Aug; 66(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 9264582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Vascular Surgeons Are Not Adequately Valued by Traditional Productivity Metrics.
Fang Z; Judelson D; Simons J; Steppacher R; Arous E; Sideman M; Schanzer A; Aiello FA
Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 May; 73():446-453. PubMed ID: 33359694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pedicled Flaps Versus Free Flaps for Back Reconstruction.
Komagoe S; Watanabe T; Komatsu S; Kimata Y
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 81(6):702-707. PubMed ID: 30247187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Pediatric Echocardiography by Work Relative Value Units: Is Study Complexity Adequately Captured?
Balasubramanian S; Kipps AK; Smith SN; Tacy TA; Selamet Tierney ES
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2016 Nov; 29(11):1084-1091. PubMed ID: 27405593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?
Benoit MF; Ma JF; Upperman BA
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 28024653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reoperative Cervical Endocrine Surgery: Appropriate Valuation for the Time and Effort?
Doval AF; Echo A; Zheng F
J Surg Res; 2021 Jul; 263():155-159. PubMed ID: 33652178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The relationship between relative value units and outcomes: a multivariate analysis of plastic surgery procedures.
Nguyen KT; Gart MS; Smetona JT; Aggarwal A; Bilimoria KY; Kim JY
Eplasty; 2012; 12():e60. PubMed ID: 23308307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Outcome of microvascular free flaps in a high-volume training centre.
Al-Dam A; Zrnc TA; Hanken H; Riecke B; Eichhorn W; Nourwali I; Smeets R; Blessmann M; Heiland M; Gröbe A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1178-83. PubMed ID: 24661422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Undervalued by the Relative Value Unit System.
Kapadia S; Ozao-Choy J; de Virgilio C; Kim D; Moazzez A
Am Surg; 2020 Oct; 86(10):1324-1329. PubMed ID: 33125258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Validation of relative value scale for congenital heart operations.
Jenkins KJ; Gauvreau K; Newburger JW; Kyn LB; Iezzoni LI; Mayer JE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Sep; 66(3):860-9. PubMed ID: 9768943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
