These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3669717)

  • 1. AIDS and the limits of discrimination law.
    Parmet WE
    Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(1-2):61-72. PubMed ID: 3669717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rights of disease victims backed; those with AIDS could benefit.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11646581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. School Board of Nassau County, Florida v. Arline.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1987 Mar; 107():1123-34. PubMed ID: 12041292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AIDS discrimination under federal, state, and local law after Arline.
    Wasson RP
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 15(2):221-78. PubMed ID: 11658972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arline, Chalk, the Civil Rights Restoration Act, and the AIDS handicap.
    Turner R
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1988; 3(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 11650099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, HIV and AIDS: legal implications.
    Gerry MH
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 2974447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination: the difference with AIDS.
    O'Brien RC
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():93-125. PubMed ID: 10105341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrimination and disability: the challenges of the ADA.
    Parmet WE
    Law Med Health Care; 1990; 18(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 2150973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protecting patients from discrimination--the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Oct; 339(17):1255-9. PubMed ID: 9780348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disability discrimination in America: HIV/AIDS and other health conditions.
    Gostin LO; Feldblum C; Webber DW
    JAMA; 1999 Feb; 281(8):745-52. PubMed ID: 10052447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AIDS and the rights of the individual: toward a more sophisticated understanding of discrimination.
    Stoddard TB; Rieman W
    Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 1):143-74. PubMed ID: 11650414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health care professionals and treatment of HIV-positive patients. Is there an affirmative duty to treat under common law, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act?
    White CC
    J Leg Med; 1999 Mar; 20(1):67-113. PubMed ID: 10230151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health law.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 1535384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. District 27 Community School. v. Board of Education.
    New York. Supreme Court, Queens County
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1986; 502():325-42. PubMed ID: 17086650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AIDS, health care workers, and the law.
    Richardson DR
    AAOHN J; 1992 Feb; 40(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 1311179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court, "Our Town," and disability policy: boardrooms and bedrooms, courtrooms and cloakrooms.
    Stowe MJ; Turnbull HR; Sublet C
    Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 16689619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Euthanasia and the Supreme Court's competing conceptions of religious liberty.
    Stacy T
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 8077103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing discrimination affecting persons with limited English proficiency: federal civil rights guidelines under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
    Rosenbaum S
    Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 15147653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court limits use of forced medications for criminal defendants.
    Young D
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2003 Aug; 60(15):1515-6. PubMed ID: 12951750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.