These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36698939)
1. Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: Techniques and early results. Gu W; Zhou K; Wang Z; Zang X; Guo H; Gao Q; Teng Y; Liu J; He B; Guo H; Huang H Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1106845. PubMed ID: 36698939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? Cuenca J; Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA; Valle JV; Campos V; Herrera JM; Rodriguez F; Portela F; Sorribas F; Juffe A Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 9814804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy. Chien S; Clark C; Maheshwari S; Koutsogiannidis CP; Zamvar V; Giordano V; Lim K; Pessotto R J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):226. PubMed ID: 32847577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement via an anterolateral approach using a standard prosthesis. Tokoro M; Sawaki S; Ozeki T; Orii M; Usui A; Ito T Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Mar; 30(3):424-430. PubMed ID: 31800039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right parasternal second intercostal transverse incision: The first Chinese experience. Lu F; Zhu SQ; Long X; Lin K; Qiu BQ; Pei X; Xu JJ; Wu YB Asian J Surg; 2021 Aug; 44(8):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33622599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do obese patients benefit from isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper sternotomy? Xie XB; Dai XF; Qiu ZH; Jiang DB; Wu QS; Dong Y; Chen LW J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Aug; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 35922828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trans-right axillary aortic valve replacement: propensity-matched comparison with standard sternotomy approach. Tokoro M; Ito T; Maekawa A; Sawaki S; Yanagisawa J; Ozeki T; Orii M Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 25(4):521-525. PubMed ID: 28962509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid-Deployment Versus Conventional Bio-Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement. Smith AL; Shi WY; Rosalion A; Yii M; O'Keefe M; Newcomb AE; Davis P Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Feb; 26(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 27523460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience. Neely RC; Boskovski MT; Gosev I; Kaneko T; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn LH Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 4(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 25694975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Right Anterior Thoracotomy vs. Median Full Sternotomy in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis. Abubokha AOK; Li R; Li CH; Zalloom AM; Wei X Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 39(3):e20230108. PubMed ID: 38569069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement: Propensity matched data from two centers. Meyer A; van Kampen A; Kiefer P; Sündermann S; Van Praet KM; Borger MA; Falk V; Kempfert J J Card Surg; 2021 Jan; 36(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 33135258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ministernotomy or sternotomy in isolated aortic valve replacement? Early results. Filip G; Bryndza MA; Konstanty-Kalandyk J; Piatek J; Wegrzyn P; Ceranowicz P; Brzezinski M; Lakkireddy D; Kapelak B; Bartuś K Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2018 Dec; 15(4):213-218. PubMed ID: 30647743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement. Oo S; Khan A; Chan J; Juneja S; Caputo M; Angelini G; Rajakaruna C; Vohra HA Perfusion; 2023 Mar; 38(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34515578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Welp HA; Herlemann I; Martens S; Deschka H Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 29617839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manubrium-limited sternotomy decreases blood loss after aortic valve replacement surgery. Burdett CL; Lage IB; Goodwin AT; White RW; Khan KJ; Owens WA; Kendall SW; Ferguson JI; Dunning J; Akowuah EF Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 19(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 24944150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement: a comparative early operative outcomes. Zallé I; Son M; El-Alaoui M; Nijimbéré M; Boumzebra D Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 40():68. PubMed ID: 34804336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]