These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Adult age differences in visual word recognition: semantic encoding and episodic retention. Madden DJ Exp Aging Res; 1986; 12(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 3569387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evidence for processing of constituent single- and multiletter codes: support for multilevel coding in word perception. Greenberg SN; Vellutino FR Mem Cognit; 1988 Jan; 16(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 3339999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Picture-word interference in learning disabled and normal children. Lovdahl KE; Brown AS; McIntyre CW; North AJ J Learn Disabil; 1986 May; 19(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 3711734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. Van Orden GC Mem Cognit; 1987 May; 15(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 3600258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Roediger HL; Blaxton TA Mem Cognit; 1987 Sep; 15(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 3670057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Common and differential electrophysiological mechanisms underlying semantic object memory retrieval probed by features presented in different stimulus types. Chiang HS; Eroh J; Spence JS; Motes MA; Maguire MJ; Krawczyk DC; Brier MR; Hart J; Kraut MA Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():77-86. PubMed ID: 27329353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discriminability and bias in the word-superiority effect. Estes WK; Brunn JL Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):411-22. PubMed ID: 3696936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Inhoff AW; Rayner K Percept Psychophys; 1986 Dec; 40(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 3808910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reading versus naming: the effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation. La Heij W; Vermeij M Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 3588233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. On visual access to letter case and lexical/semantic information. Avant LL; Thieman AA Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):392-404. PubMed ID: 4088049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cognitive processes in reading text. Healy AF Cognition; 1981; 10(1-3):119-26. PubMed ID: 7198525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. More about the letter-frequency effect. Mason M Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Are letter codes always activated? Greenberg SN Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 3226880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [The semantic encoding of pictures]. Klimesch W Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1982; 29(3):472-504. PubMed ID: 7113300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect. Solman RT Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects of an experience. Jacoby LL J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Jan; 9(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 6220114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Critical influence of particular experiences in the perception of letters, words, and phrases. Whittlesea BW; Brooks LR Mem Cognit; 1988 Sep; 16(5):387-99. PubMed ID: 3173087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]