235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36700928)
21. Clinical prospective intra-individual comparison after mix-and-match implantation of a monofocal EDOF and a diffractive trifocal IOL.
Danzinger V; Schartmüller D; Schwarzenbacher L; Röggla V; Abela-Formanek C; Menapace R; Leydolt C
Eye (Lond); 2024 Feb; 38(2):321-327. PubMed ID: 37524833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vision and patient-reported outcomes with nondiffractive EDOF or neutral aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.
Pantanelli SM; O'Rourke T; Bolognia O; Scruggs K; Longenecker A; Lehman E
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Apr; 49(4):360-366. PubMed ID: 36728998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
Rodov L; Reitblat O; Levy A; Assia EI; Kleinmann G
J Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 35(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 31298723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a Novel Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens - First Results from a Prospective Study.
Tahmaz V; Siebelmann S; Koch KR; Cursiefen C; Langenbucher A; Hoerster R
Curr Eye Res; 2022 Aug; 47(8):1149-1155. PubMed ID: 35642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses.
Rementería-Capelo LA; García-Pérez JL; Gros-Otero J; Carrillo V; Pérez-Lanzac J; Contreras I
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):163-172. PubMed ID: 32844238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.
Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Ruiz-Santos M
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 28885672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction 1 and 12 months after combined implantation of extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lenses.
McNeely RN; Moutari S; Stewart S; Moore JE
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 41(12):3985-3998. PubMed ID: 34546493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical outcomes of a monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function compared with an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.
Lee JH; Moon SY; Chung HS; Park SY; Lee H; Kim JY; Tchah H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 34117177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical performance after implantation of an EDOF intraocular lens in the dominant eye and a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in the nondominant eye.
Soscia WL; DeRojas JO; Mathews PM; Brutsky A; Solomon KD; Potvin R; Sandoval HP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2024 Jun; 50(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 38305420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of visual quality and subjective outcomes among 3 trifocal intraocular lenses and 1 bifocal intraocular lens.
Martínez de Carneros-Llorente A; Martínez de Carneros A; Martínez de Carneros-Llorente P; Jiménez-Alfaro I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 May; 45(5):587-594. PubMed ID: 30853317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Visual function after implantation of a diffractive aspheric trifocal intraocular lens.
Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega Cueto L; Belda-Salmerón L; Montés-Micó R; Fernández-Vega L
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 26(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26797852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Mix-and-Match Implantation of an Extended Depth-of-Focus and a Diffractive Bifocal Intraocular Lens.
Kim S; Yi R; Chung SH
Eye Contact Lens; 2022 Jun; 48(6):261-266. PubMed ID: 35333819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.
Zamora-de La Cruz D; Zúñiga-Posselt K; Bartlett J; Gutierrez M; Abariga SA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jun; 6(6):CD012648. PubMed ID: 32584432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens.
Poyales F; Garzon N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 45(2):135-145. PubMed ID: 30509746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. One-year post-operative comparison of visual function and patient satisfaction with trifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.
Law EM; Aggarwal RK; Buckhurst H; Kasaby HE; Marsden J; Shum G; Buckhust PJ
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 32(5):2967-2974. PubMed ID: 34931539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.
Mencucci R; Favuzza E; Caporossi O; Savastano A; Rizzo S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 256(10):1913-1922. PubMed ID: 29980919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical outcomes with a new trifocal intraocular lens.
Law EM; Aggarwal RK; Kasaby H
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 24366771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Two-surgeon, two-center evaluation of a new combined EDOF intraocular lens approach.
Mastropasqua L; Pedrotti E; Ruggeri ML; Vecchiarino L; Bonacci E; Guarini D; Falconio G; Toto L; Marchini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 May; 49(5):512-517. PubMed ID: 36700935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stability of a Novel Intraocular Lens Design: Comparison of Two Trifocal Lenses.
Poyales F; Garzón N; Rozema JJ; Romero C; de Zárate BO
J Refract Surg; 2016 Jun; 32(6):394-402. PubMed ID: 27304603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.
Lubiński W; Podborączyńska-Jodko K; Kirkiewicz M; Mularczyk M; Post M
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2553-2562. PubMed ID: 32488596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
