166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36700975)
1. A single center comparative study of two single use digital flexible ureteroscopy in the management of renal stones less than 2 cm.
Zanaty F; Elshazly M; Kandeel H; Salman B
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):777-782. PubMed ID: 36700975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Single-Center Prospective Comparative Study of Two Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: LithoVue (Boston Scientific, USA) and Uscope PU3022a (Zhuhai Pusen, China).
Patil A; Agrawal S; Singh A; Ganpule A; Sabnis R; Desai M
J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 32967450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Patil A; Sabnis RB; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3957-3962. PubMed ID: 33970313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Initial experience of comparison between two slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscopes: Indoscope Sleek (Bioradmedisys™) Versus Uscope PU3033A (Pusen™): A single-center prospective study.
Agrawal S; Survase P; Singh AG; Ganpule AP; Sabnis RB; Desai MR
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2817-2821. PubMed ID: 37543971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment.
Geavlete B; Ene C; Iordache V; Geavlete P
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021; 116(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 34191717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Comparison between Three Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope Models: A Real-World Experience.
Salvadó JA; Elorrieta V; Cabello JM; Cabello R; Velasco A
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 36318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of retrograde intrarenal surgery in lower pole stones: disposable flexible ureterorenoscope or reusable flexible ureterorenoscope?
Göger YE; Özkent MS; Kılınç MT; Taşkapu HH; Göger E; Aydın A; Sönmez MG; Karalezli G
World J Urol; 2021 Sep; 39(9):3643-3650. PubMed ID: 33738574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "no-touch" technique in the flexible ureteroscopic approach of renal stones.
Geavlete B; Cozma C; Geavlete P
J Med Life; 2021; 14(4):481-486. PubMed ID: 34621370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones.
Cui D; Ma Q; Xie S; Wang G; Li G; Chen G
Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4745. PubMed ID: 38413652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones.
Zhu Z; Cui Y; Zeng F; Li Y; Chen Z; Hequn C
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):921-929. PubMed ID: 30120500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly.
Hu H; Lu Y; He D; Cui L; Zhang J; Zhao Z; Qin B; Wang Y; Lin F; Wang S
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 26705003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for renal calculi larger than 2 cm: a matched-pair analysis.
Lv G; Wang K; Zhang Z; Zhou C; Li Y; Zhang D
Urolithiasis; 2022 Aug; 50(4):501-507. PubMed ID: 35704051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).
Li Z; Lai C; Shah AK; Xie W; Liu C; Huang L; Li K; Yu H; Xu K
BMC Urol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):27. PubMed ID: 32178654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
