131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36701323)
1. Cost Effectiveness of Concurrent Midurethral Sling at the Time of Prolapse Repair: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Wang R; Tulikangas P; Sappenfield EC
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):461-468. PubMed ID: 36701323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of behavioral and pelvic floor muscle therapy combined with midurethral sling surgery vs surgery alone among women with mixed urinary incontinence: results of the Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced With Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence randomized trial.
Harvie HS; Sung VW; Neuwahl SJ; Honeycutt AA; Meyer I; Chermansky CJ; Menefee S; Hendrickson WK; Dunivan GC; Mazloomdoost D; Bass SJ; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):651.e1-651.e26. PubMed ID: 34242627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair.
Wei JT; Nygaard I; Richter HE; Nager CW; Barber MD; Kenton K; Amundsen CL; Schaffer J; Meikle SF; Spino C;
N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(25):2358-67. PubMed ID: 22716974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of preoperative pelvic pain on outcomes after vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Sappenfield EC; Tulikangas PK; Wang R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):564.e1-564.e9. PubMed ID: 34480873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term Urinary Outcomes After Transvaginal Uterovaginal Prolapse Repair With and Without Concomitant Midurethral Slings.
Giugale L; Sridhar A; Ferrante KL; Komesu YM; Meyer I; Smith AL; Myers D; Visco AG; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz M; Zyczynski HM;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 28(3):142-148. PubMed ID: 35272320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Saraswat L; Rehman H; Omar MI; Cody JD; Aluko P; Glazener CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 1(1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 31990055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes following vaginal prolapse repair and mid urethral sling (OPUS) trial--design and methods.
Wei J; Nygaard I; Richter H; Brown M; Barber M; Xiao Xu ; Kenton K; Nager C; Schaffer J; Visco A; Weber A;
Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19342469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Autologous Rectus Fascial Sling Versus Retropubic Midurethral Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Jia X; Wang R; Hall C; Flynn MK
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):104-112. PubMed ID: 36735421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: the MASTER non-inferiority RCT.
Constable L; Abrams P; Cooper D; Kilonzo M; Cotterill N; Harding C; Drake MJ; Pardoe MN; McDonald A; Smith R; Norrie J; McCormack K; Ramsay C; Uren A; Mundy T; Glazener C; MacLennan G
Health Technol Assess; 2022 Aug; 26(36):1-152. PubMed ID: 35972773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the availability of midurethral slings on treatment strategies for stress urinary incontinence: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chang OH; Cadish LA; Kailasam A; Ridgeway BM; Shepherd JP
BJOG; 2022 Feb; 129(3):500-508. PubMed ID: 34314554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midurethral slings for women with stress urinary incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(3):1-61. PubMed ID: 23074494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Rehman H; Bezerra CC; Bruschini H; Cody JD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jan; (1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 21249648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Richardson ML; Elliott CS; Shaw JG; Comiter CV; Chen B; Sokol ER
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1306-12. PubMed ID: 23524201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.
van der Ploeg JM; van der Steen A; Oude Rengerink K; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP
BJOG; 2014 Apr; 121(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 24382099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.
Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Maher C; Haya N; Crawford TJ; Brown J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD013108. PubMed ID: 30121956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of blinding: sham suprapubic incisions in a randomized trial of retropubic midurethral sling in women undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.
Brubaker L; Nager CW; Richter HE; Weidner AC; Hsu Y; Wai CY; Paraiso M; Nolen TL; Wallace D; Meikle S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):554.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25019487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
Lapitan MCM; Cody JD; Mashayekhi A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD002912. PubMed ID: 28741303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
