These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36701524)

  • 41. Neurobiological Sensitivity to Social Rewards and Punishments Moderates Link Between Peer Norms and Adolescent Risk Taking.
    Telzer EH; Jorgensen NA; Prinstein MJ; Lindquist KA
    Child Dev; 2021 Mar; 92(2):731-745. PubMed ID: 33030267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of social context in risky decision-making: Presence of friend and low resistance to peer influence increase risky decision-making.
    Spohn DL; Devore-Suazo IF; Bernarding ML; Güss CD
    Int J Psychol; 2022 Dec; 57(6):717-726. PubMed ID: 35689336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.
    Starcke K; Brand M
    Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 142(9):909-933. PubMed ID: 27213236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control.
    van Duijvenvoorde AC; Peters S; Braams BR; Crone EA
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2016 Nov; 70():135-147. PubMed ID: 27353570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Social information use in adolescents: The impact of adults, peers and household composition.
    Molleman L; Kanngiesser P; van den Bos W
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225498. PubMed ID: 31751413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ambiguity and conflict: Dissecting uncertainty in decision-making.
    Iyer ES; Weinberg A; Bagot RC
    Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 136(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 34516164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Involvement of noradrenergic and serotonergic systems in risk-based decisions between options of equivalent expected value in rats.
    Cui RS; Ruan H; Liu LY; Li XW
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Nov; 175():107310. PubMed ID: 32890758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Social contagion of challenge-seeking behavior.
    Ogulmus C; Lee Y; Chakrabarti B; Murayama K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Oct; 153(10):2573-2587. PubMed ID: 39250231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Peers influence adolescent reward processing, but not response inhibition.
    Smith AR; Rosenbaum GM; Botdorf MA; Steinberg L; Chein JM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 18(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 29470796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Adolescents sample more information prior to decisions than adults when effort costs increase.
    Niebaum JC; Kramer AW; Huizenga HM; van den Bos W
    Dev Psychol; 2022 Oct; 58(10):1974-1985. PubMed ID: 35653763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Information gaps for risk and ambiguity.
    Golman R; Gurney N; Loewenstein G
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jan; 128(1):86-103. PubMed ID: 32757571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Social learning across adolescence: A Bayesian neurocognitive perspective.
    Hofmans L; van den Bos W
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 58():101151. PubMed ID: 36183664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Neural mechanisms of social influence in adolescence.
    Welborn BL; Lieberman MD; Goldenberg D; Fuligni AJ; Galván A; Telzer EH
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 11(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 26203050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Consequences for peers differentially bias computations about risk across development.
    Powers KE; Yaffe G; Hartley CA; Davidow JY; Kober H; Somerville LH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):671-682. PubMed ID: 29355369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differential effects of parent and peer presence on neural correlates of risk taking in adolescence.
    van Hoorn J; McCormick EM; Rogers CR; Ivory SL; Telzer EH
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 13(9):945-955. PubMed ID: 30137631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acute stress increases risky decisions and dampens prefrontal activation among adolescent boys.
    Uy JP; Galván A
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():679-689. PubMed ID: 27639352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experiencing risk: Higher-order risk attitudes in description- and experience-based decisions.
    Becker CK; Ert E; Trautmann ST; van de Kuilen G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):727-746. PubMed ID: 33180525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mother still knows best: Maternal influence uniquely modulates adolescent reward sensitivity during risk taking.
    Guassi Moreira JF; Telzer EH
    Dev Sci; 2018 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 29282834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.