163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36702501)
1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Arterial Spin-Labeling, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced, and DSC Perfusion Imaging in the Diagnosis of Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Prospective Study.
Nguyen TB; Zakhari N; Velasco Sandoval S; Guarnizo-Capera A; Alexios Gulak M; Woulfe J; Jansen G; Thornhill R; Majtenyi N; Cron GO
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):134-142. PubMed ID: 36702501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ASL and DSC perfusion methods in the evaluation of response to treatment in patients with a history of treatment for malignant brain tumor.
Bayraktar ES; Duygulu G; Çetinoğlu YK; Gelal MF; Apaydın M; Ellidokuz H
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Mar; 24(1):70. PubMed ID: 38519901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion Metrics Improve Agreement in Neuroradiologists' Clinical Interpretations of Posttreatment High-Grade Glioma Surveillance MR Imaging-An Institutional Experience.
Yamin G; Tranvinh E; Lanzman BA; Tong E; Hashmi SS; Patel CB; Iv M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2024 Apr; 45(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 38453410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with and without contrast agent leakage correction in paediatric brain tumours.
Novak J; Withey SB; Lateef S; MacPherson L; Pinkey B; Peet AC
Br J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 92(1094):20170872. PubMed ID: 30358415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DSC Perfusion MRI-Derived Fractional Tumor Burden and Relative CBV Differentiate Tumor Progression and Radiation Necrosis in Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
Kuo F; Ng NN; Nagpal S; Pollom EL; Soltys S; Hayden-Gephart M; Li G; Born DE; Iv M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2022 May; 43(5):689-695. PubMed ID: 35483909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.
Nguyen TB; Cron GO; Bezzina K; Perdrizet K; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Thornhill RE; Zanette B; Cameron IG
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Dec; 37(12):2217-2223. PubMed ID: 27585700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements.
Hu LS; Baxter LC; Smith KA; Feuerstein BG; Karis JP; Eschbacher JM; Coons SW; Nakaji P; Yeh RF; Debbins J; Heiserman JE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Mar; 30(3):552-8. PubMed ID: 19056837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of residual/recurrent gliomas from postradiation necrosis with arterial spin labeling and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging-derived metrics.
Razek AAKA; El-Serougy L; Abdelsalam M; Gaballa G; Talaat M
Neuroradiology; 2018 Feb; 60(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 29218370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors.
Arisawa A; Watanabe Y; Tanaka H; Takahashi H; Matsuo C; Fujiwara T; Fujiwara M; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N
Neuroradiology; 2018 Jun; 60(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 29705876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis? A pilot comparison of arterial spin-labeled, dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MRI, and FDG-PET imaging.
Ozsunar Y; Mullins ME; Kwong K; Hochberg FH; Ament C; Schaefer PW; Gonzalez RG; Lev MH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 20060750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling: comparison with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Qu Y; Kong D; Wen H; Ou X; Rui Q; Wang X; Lin DD; Qin Q; Wen Z
Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):2976-2987. PubMed ID: 35066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation between recurrent gliomas and radiation necrosis using arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging.
Ye J; Bhagat SK; Li H; Luo X; Wang B; Liu L; Yang G
Exp Ther Med; 2016 Jun; 11(6):2432-2436. PubMed ID: 27284331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging and
Qiao Z; Zhao X; Wang K; Zhang Y; Fan D; Yu T; Shen H; Chen Q; Ai L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 30655259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence using 3D pCASL and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging.
Wang YL; Chen S; Xiao HF; Li Y; Wang Y; Liu G; Lou X; Ma L
Radiother Oncol; 2018 Oct; 129(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 29398151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A radiomics-based comparative study on arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging in gliomas.
Hashido T; Saito S; Ishida T
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6121. PubMed ID: 32273523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
