BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3670448)

  • 1. [Mass screening for breast cancer: remaining questions].
    Verbeek AL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Sep; 131(37):1602-4. PubMed ID: 3670448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening for women 40 to 49 years of age: what is a clinician to do?
    Gemignani ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):548-9. PubMed ID: 17766597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Distressed or relieved? Psychological sequelae of breast cancer screening in Netherlands].
    van Wijngaarden DA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):873-4. PubMed ID: 10347659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mammography screening: presentation of scientific evidence as a basis for communication with women].
    Mühlhauser I; Höldke B
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):721-31. PubMed ID: 11127779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography and the value of screening.
    Whitehouse GH
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Nov; 34(5):263. PubMed ID: 3836718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cancer screening: medico-legal aspects].
    Buzzi F
    Ann Ig; 2003; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 12666320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-positive results in breast cancer screening.
    Evans MF
    Can Fam Physician; 1999 Jan; 45():73-4. PubMed ID: 10889859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A statistical evaluation of mammography: crucial questions for health systems.
    Watson CJ; Chesteen SA
    J Soc Health Syst; 1993; 4(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 8268470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography in screening for breast cancer.
    Simor IS; Jong R
    CMAJ; 1986 Aug; 135(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 3730985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70: effect on breast cancer mortality].
    van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Mar; 139(9):428-33. PubMed ID: 7891764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Thoresen S; Tretli S
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1501-7. PubMed ID: 15378474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of breast cancer-related distress following mammography screening in younger women on a family history breast screening programme.
    Brain K; Henderson BJ; Tyndel S; Bankhead C; Watson E; Clements A; Austoker J;
    Psychooncology; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1180-8. PubMed ID: 18506670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.